| American Civil Liberties Union: Attacker of Freedoms | This thread is pages long: 1 2 · «PREV |
|
terje_the_ma...

   
    
Responsible
Supreme Hero
Disciple of Herodotus
|
posted May 12, 2005 05:31 PM |
|
|
Khayman,
Quote: I also believe the ACLU diverts more of its resources to defending the rights of criminals, whereas it should be defending the rights of the victims.
Now, I might be wrong, but isn't that the job of the legal system (police, courts, ...)?
The legal system protects the law-abiding citizens (to the extent that such a creature exists; I know I've never met one ), and although they in priciple are supposed to protect the criminals as well (from their victims, actually; we don't want to return to the days of mob rule, lynching and whatnot - at least I don't), they often succumb to public pressure for harsher penalties, etc. The legal system turns into a system for revenge. Which of course isn't what it's intended to be at all.
That's why we need organizations such as the ACLU supporting the criminals as well as the law-abiding citizens (hehe): To protect the criminals from government abuse and from being convicted for something they didn't do. Amongst other things, of course.
That said, I too think that they should have reacted more against the PATRIOT Act, although I'm pretty sure they tried (I don't of course know how hard they tried, as I don't exactly pay much attention to American domestic politics...).
____________
"Sometimes I think everyone's just pretending to be brave, and none of us really are. Maybe pretending to be brave is how you get brave, I don't know."
- Grenn, A Storm of Swords.
|
|
Khayman

  
   
Promising
Famous Hero
Underachiever
|
posted May 12, 2005 05:58 PM |
|
|
Terje, I think I am going to sue you for making sense!
Terje,Quote: Khayman,
Quote: I also believe the ACLU diverts more of its resources to defending the rights of criminals, whereas it should be defending the rights of the victims.
Now, I might be wrong, but isn't that the job of the legal system (police, courts, ...)?
The legal system protects the law-abiding citizens (to the extent that such a creature exists; I know I've never met one )
Not only are you correct, but you bring up a very good point. That is the supposed job our the legal system. Our legal system, however, is quite pathetic. Swift justice & speedy trials no longer exist, more & more deals are being made between legal representatives that help keep hard criminals out of jail, and our legal system is more concerned about procedural matters than the true nature of the crime itself. All this is resulting in second, third, and fourth chances for criminals, not to mention the fact that 'accused' murderers have made a mockery out of our judicial system (high-profile cases-in-point are Orenthal J. Simpson & Robert Blake).
The police are hand-cuffed when it comes to doing their jobs. For example, criminals have access to automatic weapons whereas our police forces are limited in the types of firearms they are authorized to carry. It is a joke. Our country is so concerned with ensuring that we do not turn into a 'police state', that they are in essence preventing the protectorate from performing their jobs of preserving order & enforcing regulations.
Our country (and our legal system) is in need of a serious overhaul. The courts are tied-up with cases such as 'male student sues for right to wear make-up to school' and 'worker sues company for being subject to religious material in breakroom'. All the while accused murderers, rapists, and child molesters are running free because for some reason we do not have the legal resources to ensure they are convicted of their crimes. Gee, I wonder why?
____________
"You must gather your party before venturing forth."
|
|
terje_the_ma...

   
    
Responsible
Supreme Hero
Disciple of Herodotus
|
posted May 12, 2005 06:14 PM |
|
|
It's that ridiculous culture you have for sueing people all the time, for issues that seriously would have been better resolved by sitting down and talking rather than being brought to court. This can possibly be avoided by simply creating some kind of "brokering council", where such silly cases as your examples could be settled, and saving the rescouces of the courts for more serious crimes (or actual crimes ).
____________
"Sometimes I think everyone's just pretending to be brave, and none of us really are. Maybe pretending to be brave is how you get brave, I don't know."
- Grenn, A Storm of Swords.
|
|
Peacemaker

    
    
Honorable
Supreme Hero
Peacemaker = double entendre
|
posted May 12, 2005 06:22 PM |
|
|
|
Yes, terge, you're right about this. The new wave in the American legal system is "mediation," which is becoming more and more formally a part of many legal arenas and processes. It is increasingly rare these days that you sign a contract which doesn't bind both parties to a mediation or arbitration process, and concurrently the signatories waive their rights to seek trial before a judge/jury.
|
|
Wolfman

   
    
Responsible
Supreme Hero
Insomniac
|
posted May 13, 2005 05:36 AM |
|
|
I’ve written this in true Other Side fashion, a bunch of quotes. 
Terje -
Quote: Wolfman, you're saying that to you, the Boy Scouts' freedom to discriminate homosexuals is more important than the homosexuals' freedom from discrimination? If so, it kinda strikes me as odd...
The BSA is a private organization, and as a private organization they have the right to not accept anyone to their ranks. A court ruled this legal (though I can’t remember the date). Let the homosexuals create their own “gay scouts”, that’s completely fine with me. But, why attack an organization that has been around for 97 or so years and attempt to force them to change their policies?
Consis –
Quote: I'm from your neck of the woods. You know I'm a Texan living in Oregon. I was in the Boyscouts. I made it all the way to Life-rank. I needed 2-3 more merit badges and I already had picked out a reasonable service project. That's where it ended for me. But I never forgot the things I learned during my time at the camps and out performing community service. I think I learned a great deal about people in the way a lad should in my opinion. I also know my state pretty darn well. You and I both know that Texans and Okies have many similar common courtesies and usual customs. Their both largely christian strongholds and in turn both "red" states. One of my best friends while growing up was an Okie.
If you think I’m from Oklahoma, and that’s the impression I got from that paragraph, you’re mistaken. I’m from Nebraska, still a red state, but completely different from Texas.
I made Eagle in August, 2003. When I was doing all the things needed for it, I wasn’t so enthusiastic about it. Now that it's done, I look back and it really was one of the greatest accomplishments I have ever done. It’s opened so many doors for me.
Quote: But you need to understand that America is not officially christian. It is 76% christian. Our laws allow for other such religions as well.
I know it’s not officially Christian, and that our laws allow for other religions. That was a major part of my paper.
Quote: I think we need organizations like the ACLU because I've seen and been a part of some highly questionable religions that actually have the national anthem as one of their sermon songs they sing during sunday service.
So you think the ACLU has the right to tell these people how to worship now? I believe that’s specifically against the constitution. “Freedom of Religion” The Establishment clause was put in the first amendment to keep the government out of people’s religion.
Quote: That's what you should keep in mind as a voter. It's not which organization is perfect, but rather, which organization holds the most promise in your mind.
The ACLU holds no promise at all. In the past they did what they were designed for, helping people who need it and deserve it. People who rape kids are not the ones who are the victims in this situation. What about the kids? They’re dead. Who’s there to represent them now?
NOTE: NAMBLA also stands for the National Association of Marlon Brando Look-Alikes. I found that when doing the research for my paper.
____________
|
|
The_Gootch

    
    
Honorable
Supreme Hero
Kneel Before Me Sons of HC!!
|
posted May 13, 2005 08:36 PM |
|
|
I'm a former boyscout. I spent 2 years as one and made 1st Class. I know the good that the boyscouts do. I appreciate the direction they give young men. I appreciate the sense of community the scouts instill; that we owe something to society as a whole and strive to make the world a better place. Lord Baden Powell's dream is realized in these young men.
You mentioned Wolfman, that you made Eagle scout. Congratulations. That is no small feat. I've seen Eagle Projects before. They are arduous undertakings. And it is definitely a real accomplishment of yours.
That being said, the BSA is wrong and the ACLU is right. In voting the side of the BSA, the Supreme Court agreed with its assertation that it was a 'private religious organization.' And as a private religious organization, it is free to discriminate against atheists and homosexuals; to keep itself free of these two groups as members. And you know what? I agree that it does have the right to do that. A private organization should have the right to be choosy about its members.
But it comes at a price Wolfman. And the price is that the BSA lose public support and public funds. Bigots don't rate discounts on park property. Discriminators don't deserve one red cent from our tax coffers. Sorry, but even in light of all the good the BSA has done and will continue to do, their antiquated policies are out of step with modern society and have deserve no public support.
You've painted the BSA of this victim of a litigiously cruel ACLU when in fact all the ACLU is doing is enforcing what the Supreme Court ruled. The BSA cannot have it both ways Wolfman. Your argument is effectively, "Since we do all this great stuff for the public we deserve to have separation of church and state overlooked in our case. Pity poor us. That darn ACLU is making everyone hate us. Boo-hoo-hoo."
That to me is a losing argument.
Now in tying a class act like the ACLU to NAMBLA you're toying with emotions, especially considering the way you presented the case. I did a little bit of my own research to shed some light on what the case was about. And who better to discuss it than the ACLU? This letter is their response to the heady criticism they endured.
Quote:
ACLU Statement on Defending Free Speech of Unpopular Organizations
August 31, 2000
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
NEW YORK--In the United States Supreme Court over the past few years, the American Civil Liberties Union has taken the side of a fundamentalist Christian church, a Santerian church, and the International Society for Krishna Consciousness. In celebrated cases, the ACLU has stood up for everyone from Oliver North to the National Socialist Party. In spite of all that, the ACLU has never advocated Christianity, ritual animal sacrifice, trading arms for hostages or genocide. In representing NAMBLA today, our Massachusetts affiliate does not advocate sexual relationships between adults and children.
What the ACLU does advocate is robust freedom of speech for everyone. The lawsuit involved here, were it to succeed, would strike at the heart of freedom of speech. The case is based on a shocking murder. But the lawsuit says the crime is the responsibility not of those who committed the murder, but of someone who posted vile material on the Internet. The principle is as simple as it is central to true freedom of speech: those who do wrong are responsible for what they do; those who speak about it are not.
It is easy to defend freedom of speech when the message is something many people find at least reasonable. But the defense of freedom of speech is most critical when the message is one most people find repulsive. That was true when the Nazis marched in Skokie. It remains true today.
So Wolfman, the ACLU isn't fighting for NAMBLA's right to be rapists and murderers. They're defending NAMBLA's right to free speech. Yet you twisted this fact to further your agenda.
Furthermore, I'm extremely dubious of third party liability. NAMBLA itself didn't commit the murder. But they were being held liable for a murder that was committed by an adult.
One more thing I'd like to point out about what kind of a class act the ACLU is. One of the ACLU's most vicious critics over the years has been Rush Limbaugh. Yet when he was indicted on charges of forging prescriptions to fuel his pill addiction, who stepped up to defend him. Who stepped up to fight to keep his medical records private? I'll give you a hint. It wasn't Ralph Reed's Christian Coalition.
Another separate issue has been raised between you and Consis. Consis accused you of a 'cut and paste' job. And your reaction was one of righteous indignation. Now I've got no love for Consis. But to set the record straight, you are in fact guilty of it--at least in the past. There is no other way that this little gem of yours can be explained.
The thread was Bush: Is he a hotheaded idiot or did he save us from a nuke?
In yet another of your famous anti-Clinton diatribes you wrote
Quote: President Clinton single-handedly stopped the deployment of a national missile defense system, exposing every American life to a missile attack, leaving America with no defense whatsoever against an intercontinental ballistic missile.
To which I replied
Quote: Second, and this is to you Wolfman. The ABM treaty of 1972 expressly forbade the development technology to stop ICBMs. Both Russia and the U.S. were beholden to it. Please forgive Clinton for actually honoring a treaty.
And tell me, what is the point of a missile defense system that can stop x amount of missiles when the enemy has twice that number at their disposal?
What you said next raised my bulls*** flag.
Quote: I don't remember saying anything about that.
I was asked by someone whom I respect to go easy on you. I have young one. But I still don't think you're worth a smidgeon of civility. And they've no idea the kind of physical pain it brought me to apply a velvet glove to my response.
You've never shown any kind of genuine self-reflection here. Your writing is hackneyed, one dimensional, and until this paper, showed no consideration of alternate points of view. But why should that be a surprise when the authorities you trust i.e. radio heads and columnists are exactly the same way? The Sean Hannitys, Hans Ziegers, Tucker Carlsons, and the boatload of others in this world are poison pills man.
When are you going to get a clue?
____________
|
|
Peacemaker

    
    
Honorable
Supreme Hero
Peacemaker = double entendre
|
posted May 13, 2005 08:57 PM |
|
|
(kicks the dirt, whistles a nervous little tune, looks sheepishly to the sky...)
Ya know, this was a really good post and should have deserved a qp, until the last paragraph that is... 
Now the real dialogue begins.
I love you both (and you both knew I had to say that). I hope you can see your way to avoid talking past one another. Wolf, Gootch has presented facts and raised sound arguments here. There's some real meat in these issues I think. I for one would like to see your response.
____________
I have menopause and a handgun. Any questions?
|
|
Consis

    
     
Honorable
Legendary Hero
Of Ruby
|
posted May 13, 2005 09:36 PM |
|
Edited By: Consis on 13 May 2005
|
Peacemaker,
Have you no side with which to take? Bah, no love or not....I side with The_Gootch all the way on this one. Whether we like each other or not(usually not), he's saying what needs to be said! Rather than beat the dead horse of redundance, I'll simply clap-out-loud.
CoL man...CoL...
~p.s. : I don't think Wolfman is a fan of Tucker Carlson, but rather his opponent mr. Paul Begala. I happen to like them both. I dunno why I thought Wolfman was an Okie. I thought he lived in Oklahoma.
~p.p.s. : Peacemaker you need to step in with some important points that I know you can provide concerning the civility of the ACLU. If you are indeed a native American woman then you should be aware of the significance of an organization like the ACLU. I could understand if Wolfman criticized the NAACP but he isn't. He's turning on a the ACLU instead. I'd rather we bash the NAACP than the ACLU.
____________
Roses Are Red And So Am I
|
|
Peacemaker

    
    
Honorable
Supreme Hero
Peacemaker = double entendre
|
posted May 13, 2005 09:59 PM |
|
|
Actually I'm pretty moderate on many fronts. Generally I totally support what the ACLU stands for in principle. I have really gotten pissed off at some of their emotionally manipulative spin an a recent case or two. I generally get pissed when anybody coming from any place of such responsibility engages in spin. I imagine that's pretty apparent.
If I can find an example of what I'm talking about then I'll provide it. I actually don't recall what case or cases it was, but it really set me on edge with the ACLU.
Meanwhile, my praise of Wolf's effort here is really in terms of literary structure. As I indicated, pissed about spin or not, I don't necessarily agree with Wolf's conclusions.
In the meantime, I don't want to jump in just yet. If Wolf doesn't reply soon I might. But I will need to personally bone up on the facts involved before being able to do so intelligently.
|
|
Consis

    
     
Honorable
Legendary Hero
Of Ruby
|
posted May 13, 2005 11:12 PM |
|
Edited By: Consis on 13 May 2005
|
ACLU Supports Native Americans:
http://action.aclu.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=5059&news_iv_ctrl=-1&abbr=AS_&JServSessionIdr003=6cjdsa2n11.app1a
Quote: A True "First Voice" of America
Mary Ann Bear Heels McCowan is a meditative, spiritual woman whose Native American name means Her Good Nation Woman. She is a full-blood Lakota born to the Great Sioux Nation on the Rosebud Reservation in southern South Dakota. Don't ask her age however; she'll simply describe herself as an adult Sicangu Lakota woman.
But she is so much more than that. As co-founder of First Voices, a Native American group that lobbies the state legislature on Native American issues, she is an organizer who helps Native People gain access to their government representatives. As Secretary of the United Sioux Tribe Development Corporation, a group that supports Native Americans with job placement and affordable housing, Mary Ann offers hope and support to young Native People seeking a life off of South Dakota's reservations.
To hear her recount her activities in the early days of the American Indian Movement (AIM) one gets the sense that this is a woman who has seen and experienced much hardship but whose enthusiasm and spirit are buoyed by the positive steps she and others have taken to politically empower Native People in South Dakota and improve race relations with whites.
As a board member of the ACLU's chapter office in the Dakotas, Mary Ann feels that she can help bring about positive changes for her people by being affiliated with a national organization that seeks to protect the rights of everyone.
"We've got a great partnership here in the Dakotas," said Mary Ann. "Because of the decades of hardship and racism my people have experienced, many Native People have been suspicious of those who come offering help, but the ACLU has respected our traditions and assisted us, through the legislature and the court system, in retaining our honor."
Mary Ann will be fulfilling a lifelong dream when she travels to Washington, D.C. on June 11th to attend the ACLU's Inaugural Membership Conference as part of a 40-person delegation that includes representatives from many of South Dakota's tribes. "I have always dreamed of traveling to the nation's capitol as a delegate of my proud people."
For Mary Ann, social activism was something that chose her at an early age. In 1973 she attended a gathering of members of AIM in South Dakota and her life was transformed. She and others pledged to themselves and to their ancestors to work to correct the injustices suffered by Native People wherever they lived so that all persons, regardless of their race, can preserve dignity.
Progress toward correcting some of these injustices seemed hopeful in the late 1980s when Governor George Mickelson proposed a reconciliation agenda with Native American leaders. That burgeoning rapport was shelved however, when Governor Mickelson was tragically killed in an airplane crash and Congressman William Janklow became governor.
Mary Ann expresses optimism about first-term Governor Mike Rounds' pledge to reach out to both tribal governments and individual Native American people. "There is still a lot of work to be done and race relations are still very tense but there is new hope springing forth," she noted.
For Mary Ann, this hope takes many forms: a bill recently passed by the legislature to license a nursing home on at least one reservation; a successful youth voting program that educates and prepares young Native American to become involved in the electoral process; and improvements in sensitivity training for law enforcement officers. Hope is also embodied in the election last year of a Native American Sheriff in the town of Martin.
Look what I found..... Could this be the same ACLU that Wolfman is referring to?
____________
Roses Are Red And So Am I
|
|
Asmodean

   
    
Responsible
Supreme Hero
Heroine at the weekend.
|
posted May 13, 2005 11:36 PM |
|
|
Past history aside, let's not stoop to personalised mud-slinging please?
____________

To err is human, to arr is pirate.
|
| |
|
|