|
| Thread: Quality Points |  This thread is pages long: 1 2 3 · «PREV |
|
Conan
Responsible
Supreme Hero
|
posted June 25, 2005 05:02 PM |
|
|
Quote:
Conan,
I have edited all other posts in regards to our previous discussion. No hard feelings bud.
Same here. Thanks for that, I do appreciate.
Stiven, is it possible to an extent that what might of been a bias given QP to a post was actually a coincidence? what I mean is, it is possible that the was no favorism in the QP that where given and that all of this just happened at the wrong time and at the wrong place?
I haven't been here for as long as you so maybe I don't see it, and that's normal to some extent, but I always thought the QP's where given in a fair way. I would agree that there should be more QP's given, but from what I saw and from the examples you provided, it seemed ok for me.
I'm just asking, don't take this the wrong way, I'm really just looking to understand where this comes from. It's hard because almost all the bad talks relating to this have been deleted or edited, so I can't really look back on it. And I've seen you mention this in many posts so I was wondering. I am also wondering if it's still taking place in the present.
Thanks
____________
Your life as it has been is over. From this time forward, you will service.... us. - Star Trek TNG
|
|
Sir_Stiven
Honorable
Legendary Hero
banned
|
|
posted June 25, 2005 11:27 PM |
|
|
well earlier the whole QP circus was a playground where certain people was accepted and some not. If you were a member of the gang you would get QP's for making in some cases also very... vague QP material to put it nicely 
Whereas others had to make a killer post for recieving a QP and if they miscensored a word they got a penalty for it. Unfortunately all old "battle" threads seems to be deleted, this is a shame because they showed the truth so correct in that aspect.
What usually happend was that members of the mod friendly group would take a stance against the critism directed to the mods, get a QP a for it and others in the same group would go to a schoolbook example of a CoC violating insult and either have it ignored or in some cases even edited.
Which led to that the other group, the ones critising the mods questioned this an in sometimes using discussable language could easily end up getting penalties or as this bias thing became even more obvious, the penalties were given at other places shortly after because of things thats pathetic really.
One time in a fight ive seen penalties being dealt out to the mod supporting side, and in that case it was the 2nd handle of a member that recieved em...
coincidences? you tell me what you think.
As stated its a shame these threads has been deleted, you had the library wars.. you had a thread started by pandora called "those little red stars.." etc.
All these happens to be gone now, just look in my post in "your view of the situation" thread here in tribunal and see how many of the links thats broken.
As for more recently the fights have been seriously reduced in numbers, this having many reasons. But primarily the injustices havent been nowhere are obvious as they were before. Or the "coincidences" if you wanna call em that
But i mentioned other side as a forum which you had to be on a side to recieve bonuses. And well.. just give me one example of a post that is US critic thats been rewarded.
|
|
madmartigan
Bad-mannered
Famous Hero
who will never walk alone
|
|
posted July 06, 2005 05:21 PM |
|
|
+qp's & those who live for them
a story that never ends
Anyways, I have to do what I have to do:
I could not help but notice that in this particular thread, the swedes have posted a lot more than the canadians. Consequently, I deserve a beer.
So there !!!!!!!
|
| |
|
|
