|
| Thread: 9/11 Coinsidence Theory |  This thread is pages long: 1 2 3 · «PREV |
|
JapanGamer
Known Hero
|
posted October 15, 2008 07:28 AM |
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Imagine if China had bases in the US. I bet we'd have a bin Laden of our own, then!
Oh, who is country Bin Laden represents? You saying Bin Laden is representing Kingdom of Saudi Arabia? I think if king wanted US our he would say so.
I got a easy way of imageing this: Bin Laden is the icon for the "getthef***outofourcountryandstopattackingandaccusingosandholdingusdown!" that has been drawn and marked.
US got bases everywhere, i would blow a few of them to smitherines if i got hold of enogh power to commence a bombing. Simply because their are there so they can feel relifed about controlling whatever part of the world that "MAY" pose a treat. It is all about controll and domination, that is why their all should be blow to smitherines.
Del your sick and twisted..
____________
Pictures of god
|
|
Moonlith
Bad-mannered
Supreme Hero
If all else fails, use Fiyah!
|
|
posted October 15, 2008 02:03 PM |
|
|
Heh, don't we love indoctrination and blind trust.
____________
|
|
mvassilev
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted October 15, 2008 03:22 PM |
|
|
Elodin:
Quote:
I think if king wanted US our he would say so.
Except that the King of Saudi Arabia doesn't exactly represent the people of Saudi Arabia either. But that's beside the point; the point is that having bases in Saudi Arabia is a security threat for the United States. Therefore we should not have bases in Saudi Arabia.
Quote:
If not for US intervention Iran would be ruling Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.
What.
Quote:
It is well known Iran train and sponsor terrorist.
It is also well-known that the US overthrew Iran's democratically elected leader and installed the Shah.
Quote:
So I assume from previous statement you think Bin Laden has right to tell US what its foreign policy shall be and who its allies ahall be. Is that your position?
No, but I don't think we should be stepping on wasp nests and expecting to get away with it unstung. Actions have consequences. You overthrow a democratic leader - the country will hate you. You put bases on somebody's holy land - they'll hate you. You support the forced displacement of people - they'll hate you.
Quote:
US is not dictating Pakistan foreign policy.
No, not any more, now that Musharraf is gone. But in Musharraf's day, we were.
del_Diablo:
That's a little extreme, don't you think?
____________
Eccentric Opinion
|
|
del_diablo
Legendary Hero
Manifest
|
|
posted October 15, 2008 05:08 PM |
|
|
Extreme? The war against terror and the holocast during WW2 is to be extreme. So it can be just a matter of Opinion. Just waging war against another country or using the military presence as a treat is extreme. Hunting down all political opponents is extreme.
Is removing a treat extreme? The way the treat works may make it plausable extreme. The military bases after wars to keep another war from break out again is however not extreme, but a decade after its forgotten? Give up.
So it may just be a matter of angles and viewpoints.
|
|
Moonlith
Bad-mannered
Supreme Hero
If all else fails, use Fiyah!
|
|
posted November 06, 2008 02:11 PM |
|
|
|
mvassilev
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted November 06, 2008 02:55 PM |
|
|
|
TheDeath
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
with serious business
|
|
posted November 06, 2008 02:59 PM |
|
|
I see it, guess it's blocked in USA  (j/k)
Try a proxy or Logon Help for example.
____________
The above post is subject to SIRIOUSness.
No jokes were harmed during the making of this signature.
|
|
Moonlith
Bad-mannered
Supreme Hero
If all else fails, use Fiyah!
|
|
posted November 06, 2008 03:01 PM |
|
|
Strange, it's available to me too (netherlands).
Seriously, USA blocked?
____________
|
|
|
|
