|
| Thread: You may throw shoes at a president... |  This thread is pages long: 1 2 3 · «PREV |
|
Lexxan
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
Unimpressed by your logic
|
posted March 07, 2009 07:02 PM |
|
|
I propose we start throwing shoes at TheDeath 
____________
Coincidence? I think not!!!!
|
|
TheDeath
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
with serious business
|
|
posted March 07, 2009 07:07 PM |
|
Edited by TheDeath at 19:08, 07 Mar 2009.
|
Quote:
But you know that's not really the point. I emphasize the fact that she's a girl not because she's weaker (which she is a) for being a child b) for being a girl deal with it) but because she's A GIRL.
Any male with a sense of decensy musn't ever hit a girl/female.
You can call that sexist I call it chivalry. Not even that lol it's supposed to be common sense.
Ok I'll play your game.
It's common sense to NOT allow women to, let's say, get out of the kitchen 
Quote:
I propose we start throwing shoes at TheDeath
I propose we beat up Lexxan. He's not a girl, he won't mind
____________
The above post is subject to SIRIOUSness.
No jokes were harmed during the making of this signature.
|
|
Darkshadow
Legendary Hero
Cerise Princess
|
|
posted March 07, 2009 07:10 PM |
|
|
Quote:
I propose we beat up Lexxan. He's not a girl, he won't mind
OH YEAH  !Wait, ill go grab me bat...
____________
|
|
Azagal
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
Smooth Snake
|
|
posted March 07, 2009 07:21 PM |
|
|
Quote:
Ok I'll play your game.
It's common sense to NOT allow women to, let's say, get out of the kitchen
Yeah right and in five posts time we'll be somwhere along the lines that the moonlading was A FAKE afterall together with 9/11 being a conspiracy.
lol nice try but I won't play your game. Seriously your example doesn't even come close to what I'm talking about. I see your point but it's just too... naive. Beating women as a man is just wrong. It just is. And I won't waste anymore time explaining that to a lost cause. Think of me what you want for saying that lol.
____________
"All I can see is what's in front of me. And all I can do is keep moving forward" - The Heir Wielder of Names, Seeker of Thrones, King of Swords, Breaker of Infinities, Wheel Smashing Lord
|
|
Lith-Maethor
Honorable
Legendary Hero
paid in Coin and Cleavage
|
posted March 07, 2009 07:25 PM |
|
|
erm...
Quote:
Yeah right and in five posts time we'll be somwhere along the lines that the moonlading was A FAKE afterall together with 9/11 being a conspiracy.
actually chances are the moon landing was a fake... not saying that it didn't happen eventually, but it most likely wasn't then... the vids pretty much prove its fake
not saying anything about 9/11 ...people died, history will sort the rest
____________
You are suffering from delusions of adequacy.
|
|
Azagal
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
Smooth Snake
|
|
posted March 07, 2009 07:29 PM |
|
|
That wasn't exactly the point I was makeing but yeah thanks?
____________
"All I can see is what's in front of me. And all I can do is keep moving forward" - The Heir Wielder of Names, Seeker of Thrones, King of Swords, Breaker of Infinities, Wheel Smashing Lord
|
|
baklava
Honorable
Legendary Hero
Mostly harmless
|
|
posted March 07, 2009 07:37 PM |
|
Edited by baklava at 19:38, 07 Mar 2009.
|
Quote:
My analogies are never that off and have a direct relationship.
No they don't.
70% of them come down to comparing someone with Hitler, 20% couldn't be understood by any sentient being ever born on this or, in fact, any other planet, and the remaining 10% can be classified as both (if they are even classifiable).
No offense meant, of course. ^^
Now, then, the banishment of pedophilia can be regarded as an awfully discriminatory politic which prevents children from being with 50 year old perverts (to claim that no child wants to be with a 50 year old pervert is of course sexist and prejudiced). And it is certainly wrong to claim that children cannot defend themselves or are weaker than adults. It should perhaps be forbidden to make love with weak children, of course, but having sex with a strong, muscular 8 year old girl is perfectly alright.
But never mind. We need to stand strong and united if we are to fend off those women who are trying to conquer the world you mentioned.
|
|
TheDeath
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
with serious business
|
|
posted March 07, 2009 07:53 PM |
|
Edited by TheDeath at 19:55, 07 Mar 2009.
|
Quote:
I see your point but it's just too... naive. Beating women as a man is just wrong.
Letting a woman out of house alone is just wrong. Ask some arab nations if I remember correctly. You think you're special? But then again go and argue with those who think "naively" like that, I'm pretty sure they consider your viewpoint "naive" too.
Now that I think of it they even consider beating their wives legal!
@bak:Quote:
70% of them come down to comparing someone with Hitler
That makes no sense, I mean it doesn't even explain why that is WRONG (as an analogy). All it says is that it's repetitive. And I have no problem with that.
And you people have a weird viewpoint of Hitler, to be honest. You think of him as the devil himself. I don't compare them to THAT in analogies but to the actual "racist" and whatever leader he was, though he still had many ideologies that are shared by any human, but they hide it. (racism for example, still happens, but not necessarily all of them are nazists).
Quote:
20% couldn't be understood by any sentient being ever born on this or, in fact, any other planet
Rather, people don't want to "get them" (for obvious reasons) so they ignore them saying that they make no sense.
Bombard me with examples!
Quote:
Now, then, the banishment of pedophilia can be regarded as an awfully discriminatory politic which prevents children from being with 50 year old perverts (to claim that no child wants to be with a 50 year old pervert is of course sexist and prejudiced). And it is certainly wrong to claim that children cannot defend themselves or are weaker than adults. It should perhaps be forbidden to make love with weak children, of course, but having sex with a strong, muscular 8 year old girl is perfectly alright.
An 8 year old is weak in mentality. It's not only about physical strength here. But apart from that, isn't that what sets apart children/adults? Actual differences?
____________
The above post is subject to SIRIOUSness.
No jokes were harmed during the making of this signature.
|
|
baklava
Honorable
Legendary Hero
Mostly harmless
|
|
posted March 07, 2009 07:55 PM |
|
Edited by baklava at 19:56, 07 Mar 2009.
|
Quote:
Rather, people don't want to "get them" (for obvious reasons) so they ignore them saying that they make no sense.
Quote:
That makes no sense
What's the word...
"Flawless victory"?
|
|
TheDeath
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
with serious business
|
|
posted March 07, 2009 07:57 PM |
|
|
Quote:
That makes no sense, I mean it doesn't even explain why that is WRONG (as an analogy). All it says is that it's repetitive. And I have no problem with that.
And you people have a weird viewpoint of Hitler, to be honest. You think of him as the devil himself. I don't compare them to THAT in analogies but to the actual "racist" and whatever leader he was, though he still had many ideologies that are shared by any human, but they hide it. (racism for example, still happens, but not necessarily all of them are nazists).
____________
The above post is subject to SIRIOUSness.
No jokes were harmed during the making of this signature.
|
|
Azagal
Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
Smooth Snake
|
|
posted March 09, 2009 10:23 AM |
|
|
....you are so annoying....oO
Quote:
Letting a woman out of house alone is just wrong. Ask some arab nations if I remember correctly. You think you're special? But then again go and argue with those who think "naively" like that, I'm pretty sure they consider your viewpoint "naive" too.
Now that I think of it they even consider beating their wives legal!
How the **** is that even related? Not leaving a women out of her house is restricting her personal freedom so OF COURSE it's wrong you brainy. And yeah I hope I don't have to enlighten you on how beating a person is just wrong. And yes of course they'll consider me naive for actually granting women rights. Dude you're not ontopic (even in this offtopic discussion lol). You say I'm "sexist" or have "stereotypes" because I wouldn't beat a women simply because she's a women. This is not about women rights in Arab countries (the example is not related to the topic lol).
If I don't beat a women for the reason that she's female I don't hurt her or her rights in anyway like people do in your... perfectly understandable and most enlightning examples. Yes I'm making a choice based on her gender but it's still just wrong to beat a women. But yeah if you feel like beating women is a good thing simply because it'll make them FULLY equal you feel free to do that. I'm a Gentleman when it comes to this.
Quote:
Rather, people don't want to "get them" (for obvious reasons) so they ignore them saying that they make no sense.
And this is why you are so #%$!% infuriating. CHRIST the ego oO. Yeah right everybody who says you talking nonsense is simply subconsciously denying that you really are right. But eventhough we know you're right we suppress your genius insight just because we want to go on living "in ignorance".
... dude not everything you say is right you know? And not everybody who says your talking nonsense "doesn't want to" get them. But yes you go on believeing that. You brave missunderstood pure fighter you.
____________
"All I can see is what's in front of me. And all I can do is keep moving forward" - The Heir Wielder of Names, Seeker of Thrones, King of Swords, Breaker of Infinities, Wheel Smashing Lord
|
|
TheDeath
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
with serious business
|
|
posted March 09, 2009 04:38 PM |
|
|
Quote:
....you are so annoying....oO
tell me about it. Would I be less annoying if I started stuff like "you are so annoying!" too?
Quote:
How the **** is that even related? Not leaving a women out of her house is restricting her personal freedom so OF COURSE it's wrong you brainy. And yeah I hope I don't have to enlighten you on how beating a person is just wrong. And yes of course they'll consider me naive for actually granting women rights. Dude you're not ontopic (even in this offtopic discussion lol). You say I'm "sexist" or have "stereotypes" because I wouldn't beat a women simply because she's a women. This is not about women rights in Arab countries (the example is not related to the topic lol).
If I don't beat a women for the reason that she's female I don't hurt her or her rights in anyway like people do in your... perfectly understandable and most enlightning examples. Yes I'm making a choice based on her gender but it's still just wrong to beat a women. But yeah if you feel like beating women is a good thing simply because it'll make them FULLY equal you feel free to do that. I'm a Gentleman when it comes to this.
You could have summed that up in just 1 phrase. You talked about chivalry right? It's not universal, it's not even EQUAL.
And yes you are restricting everyone who beats women's rights MORE than when beating men. Beating is bad, but they should face the SAME consequences, not "OMG he beat a woman! Hang him!" when beating a guy is "ok, give him a punch to even it out!". seriously.
Quote:
And this is why you are so #%$!% infuriating. CHRIST the ego oO. Yeah right everybody who says you talking nonsense is simply subconsciously denying that you really are right. But eventhough we know you're right we suppress your genius insight just because we want to go on living "in ignorance".
... dude not everything you say is right you know? And not everybody who says your talking nonsense "doesn't want to" get them. But yes you go on believeing that. You brave missunderstood pure fighter you.
Absolutely thanks for awesome insight
now I said that they don't want to ANSWER it. Like say, if someone goes to a religious dude and gives contradictions from the Bible -- and he can't handle it... doesn't mean the atheist is right, but it does mean that he does not want to answer it, for obvious reasons. For me, in this religion scenario, I always answer (depending if I have time of course), but some you know... don't really "learn" it but just "follow" it, so of course they can't answer.
And by the way, being "right" has nothing to do with it. I'm mostly arguing with people who claim wrong things. That is, when they don't want to admit certain things. Such as the above that beating women is worse than beating men, and that is IN NO WAY unequal or whatever. Especially if such thing influences the cop/beater in a different way, then IT DOES INFLUENCE period.
____________
The above post is subject to SIRIOUSness.
No jokes were harmed during the making of this signature.
|
|
darkcamander55
Tavern Dweller
|
|
posted February 23, 2010 09:19 PM |
|
|
|
I would throw an anvil at the last President.
|
|
Fauch
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted February 23, 2010 11:34 PM |
|
Edited by Fauch at 23:35, 23 Feb 2010.
|
Quote:
It should perhaps be forbidden to make love with weak children, of course, but having sex with a strong, muscular 8 year old girl is perfectly alright.
huh what? being strong and muscular doesn't mean she knows what she is doing. or maybe you weren't serious?
kipshasz wrote :
Quote:
Beating around a child is sick and retarded behaviour. There is no excuse for that
does it include Xerox?
Quote:
That being said, a man doesn't usually explode like that over something so trivial as a shoe, there must've been something more that we don't know, so I for one am not going to judge the cop, simply because I don't know the whole situation.
my grandfather went furious because I dismantled a cheap pen. he didn't hit me, but I had rarely seen someone being so furious. sure, it was only words, but it was possibly more violent than that video with the cop.
and it wasn't years of rage. for a few months, it has seemed to happen fairly often, for extremly trivial things.
I guess the good thing is I didn't feel attacked, but worried for him.
|
|
Carcity
Supreme Hero
Blind Sage
|
|
posted February 24, 2010 08:27 PM |
|
Edited by Carcity at 20:28, 24 Feb 2010.
|
And it was written: Thou shalt not revive threads!
____________
Why can't you save anybody?
|
| |
|
|
