kodial79
Promising
Supreme Hero
How'd Phi's Lov't
|
posted January 14, 2011 02:11 PM |
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
I dont like the childish blah vampire from h2-h3
Because they didn't say blah in H4 at all. xD
I didn't like the H4 waiters. H3 vamps are still my favs, because they're the closest to how people actually perceived them in the middle ages, and they're an homage to the 1922 Nosferatu. The entire "I'll drink your blood and you'll like it" thing stems from the 18th century and Heroes are a medieval setting after all. Also I reckon that, on the battlefield, you're looking to frighten, not charm the enemy to death. Then again, vampires are rather vain creatures, so both approaches make sense.
It of course just boils down to whether you prefer Bela Lugosi, Max Schreck or Bill Nighy.
H2 and H5 were pretty cool, but I still prefer the H3 ones meself.
Hmm, did H3 vampire say 'blah'? I don't remember...
Anyway, there were no vanity involved with Vampires until the 19th Century's writers got their hands on them. Let's just say that before the vampire entered the world of Gothic Romance Literature, he didn't care about his appearance. He would reek of death and still be wearing the clothes that he was buried with. The Nosferatu type does come closer to this, but it's still not a perfect match. Traditional vampires were even worse than Count Orlok.
Here let me fix this for you:
It of course just boils down to whether you prefer Bela Lugosi, Max Schreck, Wesley Snipes or Robert Pattinson. 
I respectfully reject Lugosi and Schreck and kick out of the window Pattinson and Snipes. I choose Arnold Paole! 
____________
Signature? I don't need no stinking signature!
|
|
This thread is pages long: 
