Heroes of Might and Magic Community
visiting hero! Register | Today's Posts | Games | Search! | FAQ/Rules | AvatarList | MemberList | Profile


Age of Heroes Headlines:  
5 Oct 2016: Heroes VII development comes to an end.. - read more
6 Aug 2016: Troubled Heroes VII Expansion Release - read more
26 Apr 2016: Heroes VII XPack - Trial by Fire - Coming out in June! - read more
17 Apr 2016: Global Alternative Creatures MOD for H7 after 1.8 Patch! - read more
7 Mar 2016: Romero launches a Piano Sonata Album Kickstarter! - read more
19 Feb 2016: Heroes 5.5 RC6, Heroes VII patch 1.7 are out! - read more
13 Jan 2016: Horn of the Abyss 1.4 Available for Download! - read more
17 Dec 2015: Heroes 5.5 update, 1.6 out for H7 - read more
23 Nov 2015: H7 1.4 & 1.5 patches Released - read more
31 Oct 2015: First H7 patches are out, End of DoC development - read more
5 Oct 2016: Heroes VII development comes to an end.. - read more
[X] Remove Ads
LOGIN:     Username:     Password:         [ Register ]
HOMM1: info forum | HOMM2: info forum | HOMM3: info mods forum | HOMM4: info CTG forum | HOMM5: info mods forum | MMH6: wiki forum | MMH7: wiki forum
Heroes Community > Other Side of the Monitor > Thread: mass shootings in the u.s.
Thread: mass shootings in the u.s. This thread is 42 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10 20 30 ... 38 39 40 41 42 · «PREV / NEXT»
Minion
Minion


Legendary Hero
posted March 03, 2018 12:50 PM

Oh goodie, a reliable facebook post spread by a gun advocate. Lets start with this gem. "Do the math: 0.000000925% of the population dies from gun related actions each year." Yeah he should do his math alright, he is off by a mere factor of 10,000. A coincidence? Actually maybe so, because percentage points were hard when you were in third grade. ;P

Then I can see where you got that California slander. It has tighter gun regulations so it must have more gun violence? Especially compared to Alabama with virtually no gun laws. Wrong. Top 3 states with HIGHEST firearm deaths are Alaska, Luisiana and ALABAMA. The notorious California is found at the bottom of the list being the 42nd state. What a shocker.

Thirdly it is simply pointless to compare heart disease, cancer etc. to death by gunshot. Apples to oranges, they are unrelated. But to be clever with stats, firearms killed more 15 to 19 year olds than cancer, heart disease, and diabetes combined in 2016. Anyways a tad pointless topic for me personally, I am mostly against the easy access of assault weapons. Which cause mass shootings.
____________
"These friends probably started using condoms after having produced the most optimum amount of offsprings. Kudos to them for showing at least some restraint" - Tsar-ivor

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
fred79
fred79


Disgraceful
Undefeatable Hero
posted March 03, 2018 01:12 PM

you should know that i stopped at "oh goodie".

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
artu
artu


Promising
Undefeatable Hero
My BS sensor is tingling again
posted March 03, 2018 01:26 PM

I didn't and well-said.
____________
Are you pretty? This is my occasion. - Ghost

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
OhforfSake
OhforfSake


Promising
Legendary Hero
Initiate
posted March 03, 2018 01:48 PM
Edited by OhforfSake at 13:55, 03 Mar 2018.

From the news media in my country I have gotten the impression that the gun lobby is under pressure now, is that also the impression you guys have?

Edit: Lol Fred that guy can't indeed do simple math. He has divided by 100 where he should have multiplied by 100.

30k to 300 million is a factor of 10k, or 0,01% of the total US population. For his number to be accurate, the total amount would have to be 3 people, not 30.000 people.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
fred79
fred79


Disgraceful
Undefeatable Hero
posted March 03, 2018 01:56 PM

via lori robertson from factcheck.org:

Quote:
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention publishes statistics on firearm deaths and the death rate, which would be a fairer measure in comparing states of various populations. The death rate is the number of deaths per 100,000 people. The CDC also gives age-adjusted death rates, since such rates are influenced by the age of the population. This levels the comparison between different groups.

For 2013, the 10 states with the highest firearm age-adjusted death rates were: Alaska (19.8), Louisiana (19.3), Mississippi (17.8), Alabama (17.6), Arkansas (16.8), Wyoming (16.7), Montana (16.7), Oklahoma (16.5), New Mexico (15.5) and Tennessee (15.4).

The 10 states with the lowest firearm age-adjusted death rates were, starting with the lowest: Hawaii (2.6), Massachusetts (3.1), New York (4.2), Connecticut (4.4), Rhode Island (5.3), New Jersey (5.7), New Hampshire (6.4), Minnesota (7.6), California (7.7) and Iowa (8.0).

Firearm deaths, however, include suicides, and there are a lot of them. In 2013, there were a total of 33,636 firearm deaths, and 21,175, or 63 percent, were suicides, according to the CDC. Homicides made up 11,208, or 33 percent, of those firearm deaths. The rest were unintentional discharges (505), legal intervention/war (467) and undetermined (281).

Homicide data for 2013 don’t give us a clear picture of homicides only by firearm; however, 70 percent of homicides for the year were by firearm. The 10 states with the highest homicide rates were: Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas, Maryland, Oklahoma, South Carolina, New Mexico, Missouri and Michigan. That lists includes six states that also have the highest firearm death rates.

The 10 states with the lowest homicide rates are: North Dakota, Vermont, Wyoming, New Hampshire, Utah, Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts and Oregon.

The number of homicides that occurred in the first three states were so low that their death rates were zero. Wyoming is an interesting case, because it has one of the highest firearm death rates but a homicide rate of zero.

What role do gun control laws play in these statistics? It’s difficult to say. One news report that compiled these same CDC numbers on firearm death rates, by 24/7 Wall Street and published by USA Today, listed several reasons besides gun laws that these states might have high rates of gun deaths (suicides included). Many of the states also have higher rates of poverty, lower educational attainment and perhaps more rural areas that make getting to a hospital in time to save someone’s life difficult.

But that report also noted weaker gun laws were common among the states with higher gun death rates: “In fact, none of the states with the most gun violence require permits to purchase rifles, shotguns, or handguns. Gun owners are also not required to register their weapons in any of these states. Meanwhile, many of the states with the least gun violence require a permit or other form of identification to buy a gun,” reporter Thomas C. Frohlich wrote.

The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence and the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, both groups that advocate for strong gun laws, published a scorecard on state gun laws in 2013, giving higher letter grades to states with stronger gun laws. Nine of the 10 states with the highest firearm death rates, according to the CDC, got an “F” for their gun laws, and one of them got a “D-.” (Note that most states — 26 of them — received an “F.”) Seven of the states with the lowest firearm death rates got a “B” or higher; two received a “C” or “C-“; and one — New Hampshire — got a “D-.”

But again, that’s a correlation, not a causation. And the homicide rate statistics don’t show the same pattern. Eight of the 10 states with the highest homicide rates and eight of the 10 states with the lowest homicide rates all got “D” or “F” grades from the Brady Campaign analysis.

We have written before about gun control issues, and the inability to determine causation between gun laws and gun violence. As Susan B. Sorenson, a professor of social policy at the University of Pennsylvania, told us in 2012, “We really don’t have answers to a lot of the questions that we should have answers to.” And that’s partly because a scientific random study — in which one group of people had guns or permissive gun laws, and another group didn’t — isn’t possible.

When we asked the White House about Obama’s claim, a spokesman sent us links to other studies that found states with more gun restrictions had fewer gun deaths, backing up Obama’s claim that “states with the most gun laws tend to have the fewest gun deaths.” But it doesn’t back up his claim that “the evidence” shows there is a link between the gun deaths and gun laws.

Researchers at Boston Children’s Hospital and the Harvard School of Public Health looked at gun laws and gun deaths in all 50 states from 2007 to 2010, concluding that: “A higher number of firearm laws in a state are associated with a lower rate of firearm fatalities in the state, overall and for suicides and homicides individually.” Their research was published in JAMA Internal Medicine in May 2013. But the study said that it couldn’t determine cause-and-effect.

One of the authors, Dr. Eric Fleegler, a pediatric emergency medicine physician at Boston Children’s Hospital, told the Boston Globe that “n states with the most laws, we found a dramatic decreased rate in firearm fatalities, though we can’t say for certain that these laws have led to fewer deaths.”
Fiorina’s Claim

Fiorina made her claim on Sept. 24 in a speech in Greenville, South Carolina, when asked about her views on guns (see the 43:40 mark). She said that the gun laws currently on the books aren’t enforced. “That is why you see in state after state after state with some of the most stringent gun control laws in the nation also having the highest gun crime rates in the nation. Chicago would be an example,” she said.

We asked the Fiorina campaign for support for that claim, and to clarify whether she meant states or cities, since she mentioned Chicago. We have not received a response, but we will update this article if we do.

Fiorina said “gun crime rates,” not just “gun deaths,” as the president claimed. The FBI has statistics on violent crimes committed with a firearm, including murder, robbery and aggravated assault, though its data come from voluntary reporting from law enforcement agencies. When we last researched firearm deaths, experts advised us to use the CDC data, since it came from required death-certificate reporting.

But what about robberies with a firearm, or aggravated assaults? We calculated firearm robbery rates for the states, using the FBI data for 2014, and the states with the highest rates are Nevada, Mississippi, Georgia, Maryland and Louisiana. Four out of five of those states received an “F” from the groups that advocate tougher gun laws. (We discounted Illinois, which reported limited data to the FBI.)

We then did the same rate calculation for aggravated assaults with a firearm in 2014. The top five states: Tennessee, South Carolina, Arkansas, Louisiana and Delaware. The last state was the only one not to receive an “F.”

As for Chicago, the Pew Research Center published a report in 2014 that found that while Chicago had seen a lot of murders in raw numbers, smaller cities had a higher rate, adjusted for population. Using FBI data — with the caveat that it is reported by local police agencies and not always consistently — the Pew Research Center determined that the top cities in 2012 for the murder rate were Flint, Michigan; Detroit; New Orleans; and Jackson, Mississippi. Chicago came in 21st.

An August 2013 CDC report looked at rates for gun homicides in the 50 most populous metropolitan areas. It found that for 2009-2010, the top gun murder rate areas were, in order: New Orleans, Memphis, Detroit, Birmingham, St. Louis, Baltimore, Jacksonville, Kansas City, Philadelphia and Chicago.

Six of those cities are in states with poor scores for their gun laws, while the other four get a “C” or better. Chicago, which placed last in the top 10, had a ban on handguns at the time. There’s no discernible pattern among those cities, nor clear or convincing evidence in these statistics that shows more gun laws lead to more or less gun crime.

— Lori Robertson

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
fred79
fred79


Disgraceful
Undefeatable Hero
posted March 03, 2018 02:03 PM

OhforfSake said:
From the news media in my country I have gotten the impression that the gun lobby is under pressure now, is that also the impression you guys have?


the gun lobby is always under pressure from the anti-gun lobbyists. that never changes.

OhforfSake said:
Edit: Lol Fred that guy can't indeed do simple math. He has divided by 100 where he should have multiplied by 100.

30k to 300 million is a factor of 10k, or 0,01% of the total US population. For his number to be accurate, the total amount would have to be 3 people, not 30.000 people.


does that one mistake that guy made, completely negate everything else he said? does one mistake negate all of the good intentions of a person? because if you think so, then because our founding fathers had slaves, the entire idea behind founding the u.s. would be at fault.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
OhforfSake
OhforfSake


Promising
Legendary Hero
Initiate
posted March 03, 2018 02:29 PM
Edited by OhforfSake at 14:32, 03 Mar 2018.

No, but it means his opening point, amount of people involved in gun tragedy being insignificant is wrong, and it does make a bad impression that he doesn't check up on his numbers, especially given those numbers are relevant, simple to check up on and his opening point.

It reminds me of an article I once read about a device that could with 99% accuracy (or maybe 99,9%? determine if someone was a bad guy. On paper it sounded pretty good, but the problem was that it basically meant it would in average tell you that 1000-10k people out of a million would be a bad guy no matter if they were or weren't. Which didn't sound that good anymore.

Edit: Some of the other things he wrote are also a bit silly in my opinion, but it's not something I'm really interested in discussing. I don't know what intentions has to do with it, though.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Minion
Minion


Legendary Hero
posted March 03, 2018 02:29 PM
Edited by Minion at 14:53, 03 Mar 2018.

So when there is evidence on state level that gun laws work, you dissect them and go into cities? Really?

The truth is though there is very little research into gun violence at all. Lack of evidence is not an accident, no sir, but a political choice, shaped by more than two decades of opposition to federally funded gun research from the NRA and other gun rights advocates.

Great job at keeping the public in the dark while selling guns


____________
"These friends probably started using condoms after having produced the most optimum amount of offsprings. Kudos to them for showing at least some restraint" - Tsar-ivor

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
fred79
fred79


Disgraceful
Undefeatable Hero
posted March 03, 2018 03:12 PM

Minion said:
Great job at keeping the public in the dark while selling guns


thanks, sugarplum. i do what i can.

btw, great job on avoiding the information i just posted that completely negates your feelings on the matter. that, combined with the simple fact that the u.s. populace will ALWAYS have guns as long as the populace actually stand for the beliefs the u.s. was founded on; it's easily apparent to anyone with any real sense, that your views(and indeed, any anti-gun sentiment whatsoever) on this matter don't have a leg to stand on. because even if you have half the population willing to give up their guns or gun rights(which you don't), the other half will still resist.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
JollyJoker
JollyJoker


Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
posted March 03, 2018 03:28 PM

It's not like I wouldn't adore this song/video - but maybe this is even more your song than mine, fred.

In case you don't know it, don't like it or whatever, the crucial points are at 1:10 and 3:50 - although I always really enjoy that first minute of utter, well, contempt for the original.

That's the spirit.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Minion
Minion


Legendary Hero
posted March 03, 2018 03:32 PM

No, the trends on statewide level are clear on the matter. You can search for cities inside the states that don't neatly follow the trend because well you have to keep your bubble intact don't you, honey

But a real question, so do you agree with the ban that is on the research on gun violence?
____________
"These friends probably started using condoms after having produced the most optimum amount of offsprings. Kudos to them for showing at least some restraint" - Tsar-ivor

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
fred79
fred79


Disgraceful
Undefeatable Hero
posted March 03, 2018 03:45 PM

@ jj: lol, NOW you get it. that's the entire spirit of the good 'ol u.s. of a!



@ minion: are you really suggesting that there is, or ever will be, a ban on the research of gun violence? what an interesting discussion point.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Minion
Minion


Legendary Hero
posted March 03, 2018 03:54 PM

Why gun violence research has been shut down for 20 years

Man for a guy with lots of opinions on the matter you know so so little.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
fred79
fred79


Disgraceful
Undefeatable Hero
posted March 04, 2018 01:29 AM
Edited by fred79 at 01:30, 04 Mar 2018.

i could say the same for you. whoever wrote that article is clearly retarded, since they make a liar out of themselves in their own article. it says "20 years", and yet, gun studies have been done since then. maybe if you actually READ the link you posted, you'd know that, too; and wouldn't look so incredibly foolish right now.

besides, face the facts: you know jack snow about american culture. and your opinion is NEVER going to change anything in the u.s., even if you DID. why you(and the other anti-gun guys that are railing against me on this) keep seeming to think so, is confusing.

i have a question for you: since you and artu seemed to completely dismiss what the point of that article that markkur sent me was all about, just what IS your reasoning behind giving a snow what happens in the u.s.? do you think you would be so up-in-arms about medical malpractice causing deaths here in the states, as well? or heart disease? i mean, what exactly is the reason WHY you guys are so adamant about being anti-gun? because, as the article was trying to point out to you(despite the fact that the guy sucks at math), you guys caring about what only attribute to a fraction of american deaths, and not the larger killers of us, only serves to point out your bias. so just say it: you're afraid of guns, and you don't think people should have them, because you're afraid. let's cut the bullsnow, and get right to the meat of why you guys are continually arguing about something you have no STAKE in.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Corribus
Corribus

Hero of Order
The Abyss Staring Back at You
posted March 04, 2018 03:46 AM

There have been gun studies but few from qualified, impartial academics because the CDC is prevented by law to fund any gun research since 1996. One wonders how we are expected to make fact based decisions about something when we aren't even allowed to study it. It's ridiculous.
____________
I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask them where they're goin', and hook up with them later. -Mitch Hedberg

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
artu
artu


Promising
Undefeatable Hero
My BS sensor is tingling again
posted March 04, 2018 10:58 AM

Corribus said:
the CDC is prevented by law to fund any gun research since 1996.

Considering how big finance (weapon industry in this case) and politics are married, especially in the U.S., even that speaks volumes by itself.
____________
Are you pretty? This is my occasion. - Ghost

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Kipshasz
Kipshasz


Undefeatable Hero
Elvin's Darkside
posted March 04, 2018 12:17 PM

There was another shooting in a university this time, supposed 2 are dead, but since, at least according to the reports, the shooter was a dindu nuffin kang, there's little coverage for it. Now imagine if the kang was shot by the cops.
____________
"Kip is the Gavin McInnes of HC" - Salamandre
"Ashan to the Trashcan", "I got PTSD from H7. " - LizardWarrior

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
fred79
fred79


Disgraceful
Undefeatable Hero
posted March 04, 2018 04:12 PM
Edited by fred79 at 16:18, 04 Mar 2018.

the cdc is the center for disease control and prevention. i don't see what they're even doing, studying something outside their field. but then, it's not like we need the atf studying something like this; because they're clearly inept at their own jobs.

that said, it's plain to see what's causing the gun violence. i've already pointed it all out, and i'm just some guy. if some random guy can figure it out based on the factors creating hostility and violence in the u.s., then how can't anyone else?

i've mentioned this before(though not in this thread), and i'll state it again: we need an accountability department in the u.s.  it could cover everything to corruption, to the grossly irresponsible. people in this country have been irresponsible, and far too slack on offenders of all types; including those in the government and their agencies, for far too long. we need something that speaks for the u.s., and for it's people, to make sure that everyone is doing the right thing; and if not, to out them and punish them. that people can continually get away with serious crimes(and what causes them) towards the mass public and overseas, is downright embarassing, as a nation.

blaming guns for what people do, is attempting to put a bandaid on a bullet wound.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
fred79
fred79


Disgraceful
Undefeatable Hero
posted March 20, 2018 07:18 PM

high-school gunman shot and killed by security officer

take a look and learn a valuable lesson, florida police. this is how armed security at a school are SUPPOSED to act.

Quote:
GREAT MILLS, Md., March 20 (Reuters) - A 17-year-old student shot and critically wounded two fellow students at a Maryland high school on Tuesday morning before dying after exchanging gunfire with a campus security officer, the county sheriff said.

The shooting, which came amid a renewed national debate over gun violence following a school massacre in Florida last month, occurred just before 8 a.m. (1200 GMT) at Great Mills High School in St. Mary's County, county Sheriff Timothy Cameron said.

A 16-year-old girl and a 14-year-old boy were wounded and taken to hospitals. The girl was in intensive care with life-threatening critical injuries, the sheriff said, while the boy was in good condition.

The gunman was identified as Austin Wyatt Rollins, and Cameron said there was "an indication" of a prior relationship between him and the female student, though he said that was still under investigation.

Rollins pulled out a Glock semiautomatic handgun around 7:55 a.m. (1155 GMT) in a hallway and shot the students, the sheriff said.

The attack, which lasted less than a minute, ended after the school resource officer, Deputy 1st Class Sheriff Blaine Gaskill, ran inside the building and engaged with Rollins, with both firing a single round almost simultaneously.

The officer was not harmed, Cameron sheriff said. Rollins was confirmed deceased at 10:41 a.m. ET (1441 GMT) after being taken to a hospital.

"You never think it'll be your school and then it is," Mollie Davis, who identified herself as a student at the school, wrote on Twitter. "Great Mills is a wonderful school and somewhere I am proud to go. Why us?"


"why us?", indeed. since maryland is one of the more stringent states on gun laws, you would figure they would be safer. apparently, they're only safer because they have armed guards at the school that actually DO their goddamn jobs.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Minion
Minion


Legendary Hero
posted March 20, 2018 09:45 PM

When you have acces to handguns but not an easy one to assault weapons, situations don't get out of hand as easily and the guards can actually step in. Thank god Maryland has stricter gun laws. If the freds of Maryland had gotten their way and everyone were carrying AK-15:s then we could be looking at 20 dead children again. I care for the people, you care for the guns. That is the difference.
____________
"These friends probably started using condoms after having produced the most optimum amount of offsprings. Kudos to them for showing at least some restraint" - Tsar-ivor

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Jump To: « Prev Thread . . . Next Thread » This thread is 42 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10 20 30 ... 38 39 40 41 42 · «PREV / NEXT»
Post New Poll    Post New Topic    Post New Reply

Page compiled in 0.1130 seconds