| The 5 Universal Laws of Human Stupidity | |
|
artu
Promising
Undefeatable Hero
My BS sensor is tingling again
|
posted August 28, 2017 02:22 AM |
|
|
|
Elvin
Admirable
Omnipresent Hero
Endless Revival
|
|
posted August 28, 2017 06:07 AM |
|
Edited by Elvin at 06:14, 28 Aug 2017.
|
The biggest problem is their unpredictability, they have no idea how dangerous they can be to others everytime they make a decision. Even intelligent people are unlikely to reasonably evaluate or deduct what they will do, what consequences there will be or even who will be affected.
EDIT:
This is a most quotable article.
____________
For H5 and Olden Era, join the Heroes Tactical Duels discord server!
H5 Duel Map hosted on Moddb
|
|
Stevie
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted August 28, 2017 12:00 PM |
|
|
artu said:
Law 3. A stupid person is a person who causes losses to another person or to a group of persons while himself deriving no gain and even possibly incurring losses.
At the very least there is a level of satisfaction for doing something or acting according to your own will or rationale regardless of the end result. In that sense, one could argue that there are virtually no stupid persons in the world at all. Of course, there's also those that wish misery and misfortune purposefully, but I wouldn't call them stupid.
____________
Guide to a Great Heroes Game
The Young Traveler
|
|
artu
Promising
Undefeatable Hero
My BS sensor is tingling again
|
|
posted August 28, 2017 12:07 PM |
|
|
He's an economist, so his perspective is shaped by evaluation of gain and loss. There are sure destructive or even self-destructive people who are not stupid, there are even many self-destructive geniuses. But this is not an encylopedic definition, it's rather a tongue-in-cheek interpretation and something interesting to share.
____________
Are you pretty? This is my occasion. - Ghost
|
|
Stevie
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
|
|
posted August 28, 2017 12:09 PM |
|
|
|
Elvin
Admirable
Omnipresent Hero
Endless Revival
|
|
posted August 28, 2017 12:33 PM |
|
|
Well, you more or less know what to expect from an economist  Of course an economist also knows that sometimes losing something is worth it when you prevent an antagonist from gaining something but that mostly applies to the business world. Outside of it, such a decision is more than likely to carry ill intent or immaturity.
____________
For H5 and Olden Era, join the Heroes Tactical Duels discord server!
H5 Duel Map hosted on Moddb
|
|
OhforfSake
Promising
Legendary Hero
Initiate
|
|
posted August 28, 2017 02:05 PM |
|
|
How about those of us who does not cause losses to another person or to a group of persons while himself deriving no gain and even possibly incurring losses, nor do we underestimate the damaging power of stupid individuals? 
Or those of us who do both? 
Elvin said:
The biggest problem is our unpredictability, they have no idea how dangerous we can be to others everytime we make a decision. Even intelligent people are unlikely to reasonably evaluate or deduct what we will do, what consequences there will be or even who will be affected.
Sorry, but this way it at least sounds a lot more like a super villain organization.
|
|
|
|
