|
Thread: The Future of the Democratic Party | |
|
Laelth
![Laelth](images/avatars/laelth.gif)
![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif)
![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif)
Famous Hero
Laelth rhymes with stealth.
|
posted November 22, 2004 02:55 AM |
|
Edited By: Laelth on 21 Nov 2004
|
The Future of the Democra
In my more morose moods, I have reason to believe that we're in for about 20 years of one-party rule in America (and I mean Republican-party rule). Of course, all it will take is a nice global depression to bring Americans back to their senses. It usually takes a major crisis for people to look to the left for a solution. Anyway, there are a number of people working to reinvigorate the near-dead Democratic party in the US. After twenty years of being labeled "weak, wussy, wimpy, and worse" by the opposition and usually the media too, it's an uphill battle. Perhaps we'll be lucky and the US will turn back to the left before we have a depression or another World War. I'm skeptical about that, though.
Here are some marketing tools that I'm sharing, just to show you one of the current efforts to revive the "brand name" of the Democratic party:
![](http://www.vandea.com/graphics/branddem1.jpg)
![](http://www.vandea.com/graphics/branddem2.jpg)
![](http://www.vandea.com/graphics/branddem3.jpg)
![](http://www.vandea.com/graphics/branddem4.jpg)
![](http://www.vandea.com/graphics/branddem5.jpg)
![](http://www.vandea.com/graphics/branddem6.jpg)
![](http://www.vandea.com/graphics/branddem7.jpg)
![](http://www.vandea.com/graphics/branddem8.jpg)
![](http://www.vandea.com/graphics/branddem9.jpg)
![](http://www.vandea.com/graphics/branddem10.jpg)
![](http://www.vandea.com/graphics/branddem11.jpg)
![](http://www.vandea.com/graphics/branddem12.jpg)
If you're interested in purchasing shirts or buttons with any of these slogans, you can find BarandDemocrat merchandise HERE.
-Laelth
Edit:Laelth--corrected URL.
____________
Alan P. Taylor, Attorney at Law, LLC
|
|
Trogdor
![Trogdor](images/avatars/Trogdor-2021.png)
![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif)
![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif)
Legendary Hero
Words in a custom title
|
posted November 22, 2004 05:48 AM |
|
|
If only they were available in Australia.
____________
"Through the power of the dollar you can communicate with the dead." - Artu
|
|
Wolfman
![Wolfman](images/avatars/48toh.jpg)
![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif)
![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif)
Responsible
Supreme Hero
Insomniac
|
posted November 22, 2004 05:51 AM |
|
|
I'm sorry, I couldn't resist...had to make some of my own. I'm with you though, trying to pump up the Democrats.
![](http://ee.1asphost.com/heroescommunity/Wolfman/DemPoster1.jpg)
![](http://ee.1asphost.com/heroescommunity/Wolfman/DemPoster2.jpg)
More coming soon!
____________
|
|
Laelth
![Laelth](images/avatars/laelth.gif)
![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif)
![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif)
Famous Hero
Laelth rhymes with stealth.
|
posted November 22, 2004 05:58 AM |
|
|
You're absolutely right on the slavery thing there, WolfMan. Some of us learn from our mistakes.
And don't let your creative talents go to waste. The Democratic party isn't quite dead yet.
Kick 'em while they're down!
-Laelth
____________
Alan P. Taylor, Attorney at Law, LLC
|
|
Wolfman
![Wolfman](images/avatars/48toh.jpg)
![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif)
![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif)
Responsible
Supreme Hero
Insomniac
|
posted November 22, 2004 06:01 AM |
|
|
Oh, they won't go to waste. ![](images/smilies/wink.gif)
The first one's right too, by the way.
And I'll kick 'em when they're down, just as I've kicked 'em when they're up.
In 2008, the Democrats should nominate 3 candidates just like in 1860! Just for a change, that is what the Democrats are all about, right?
____________
|
|
Shiva
![Shiva](images/avatars/ShivaC.jpg)
![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif)
![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif)
Promising
Famous Hero
|
posted November 24, 2004 03:40 PM |
|
|
This election was an uphill battle against conservative values. Such values are regressive and don't look to the future in any positive way. They just say, lets protect what we have. Protect our money through less taxes, protect our industry through weak environmental laws, and protect our country through playing on fear. They conserve the present at the expense of the future.
What the Democratic party needs is vision. A vision of the future that projects freedom from fear, freedom from policies that erode Democracy while pretending to protect it. And it needs someone capable of expressing this vision in a way that people can understand and believe.
No negative campaign can stand in the way of a creative vision.
|
|
Wolfman
![Wolfman](images/avatars/48toh.jpg)
![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif)
![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif)
Responsible
Supreme Hero
Insomniac
|
posted November 24, 2004 10:51 PM |
|
|
What the Democratic Party needs is some actual political strategists. Dump Paul Begala and James Carville, who's strategic political advice to the Democrats was basically to call Republicans names. Didn't work, and the country is better because of it.
____________
|
|
privatehudson
![privatehudson](images/avatars/Hudson.jpg)
![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif)
![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif)
Responsible
Legendary Hero
The Ultimate Badass
|
posted November 25, 2004 11:40 AM |
|
|
Yeah, we all know the Republicans and right wing have already mastered the art of mudslinging, insults and false claims, why try and beat them on their specialty?
|
|
terje_the_ma...
![terje_the_mad_wizard](images/avatars/Samarquand.jpg)
![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif)
![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif)
Responsible
Supreme Hero
Disciple of Herodotus
|
posted November 25, 2004 12:49 PM |
|
|
Quote: What the Democratic Party needs is some actual political strategists. Dump Paul Begala and James Carville, who's strategic political advice to the Democrats was basically to call Republicans names. Didn't work, and the country is better because of it.
I agree. They should stop pretending to be Republicans, and thake back the people. Move to the left, in other words. Although I'm not too sure that is the way to gain public support in the US anymore...
____________
"Sometimes I think everyone's just pretending to be brave, and none of us really are. Maybe pretending to be brave is how you get brave, I don't know."
- Grenn, A Storm of Swords.
|
|
Aquaman333
![Aquaman333](images/avatars/h5-cr-WaterElemental.gif)
![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif)
![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif)
Famous Hero
of the seven seas
|
posted November 30, 2004 11:56 PM |
|
|
Quote: This election was an uphill battle against conservative values. Such values are regressive and don't look to the future in any positive way. They just say, lets protect what we have. Protect our money through less taxes, protect our industry through weak environmental laws, and protect our country through playing on fear. They conserve the present at the expense of the future.
Conservative values are regressive? Values are in no way regressive. Kerry was cold, harsh, and distant. That was why he lost. The people felt that Bush was the better candidate to protect morality which has come under severe attack what with things like abortions and stem cell research becoming hot topics. Bush won as a person not a Republican, he won because he came off as a guy who could lead America back to her former church-going self.
____________
"Brian, look! There's a message in my Alphabits! It says,
"OOOOOOO!"."
"Peter, those are Cheerios."-Family Guy
|
|
privatehudson
![privatehudson](images/avatars/Hudson.jpg)
![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif)
![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif)
Responsible
Legendary Hero
The Ultimate Badass
|
posted December 01, 2004 12:01 PM |
|
|
Even though your own founding fathers were quite specific about keeping religion and state seperate...
I doubt Abortion and Stem Cell research were the issues anyway since polls tend to show a different picture from those in the elections on both those issues.
____________
We're on an express elevator to Hell, goin' down!
|
|
terje_the_ma...
![terje_the_mad_wizard](images/avatars/Samarquand.jpg)
![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif)
![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif)
Responsible
Supreme Hero
Disciple of Herodotus
|
posted December 01, 2004 12:10 PM |
|
|
Funny thing about stem cell research:
The Reagans used to be all against it, until they found out that stem cell reasearch could be a way to find a cure for Alzheimer. Which the old geezer (I know I should respect the dead, and I do: I respect and honour the 30.000 dead Nicaraguans, amongst others) was suffering from.
So now, Ronal and Nancy's daughter Patty critisizes the Bush administraion for banning it. So does Nancy herself.
____________
"Sometimes I think everyone's just pretending to be brave, and none of us really are. Maybe pretending to be brave is how you get brave, I don't know."
- Grenn, A Storm of Swords.
|
|
privatehudson
![privatehudson](images/avatars/Hudson.jpg)
![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif)
![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif)
Responsible
Legendary Hero
The Ultimate Badass
|
posted December 01, 2004 12:46 PM |
|
|
Most of what I've read on the topic says much about how misinformation and ignorance can lead to opposition to a worthwile scheme.
____________
We're on an express elevator to Hell, goin' down!
|
|
Peacemaker
![Peacemaker](images/avatars/WaterEl.jpg)
![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif) ![](images/rta.gif)
![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif) ![](images/star.gif)
Honorable
Supreme Hero
Peacemaker = double entendre
|
posted December 27, 2004 07:50 PM |
|
|
Reformation of the Democratic Party
Laelth, I share your despair. But I want all you Dems to know that there are some rather brilliant minds at work on how to hijack the Democratic party in the next four years, taking with them a huge slice of moderate Repubs who are equally disenchanted with the fundamentalist movement at work in their party.
As argued in the book, "The Culture War," the parties are producing extremist candidates in both ends of the spectrum, creating a largely misleading appearance that America has become a bunch of polarized extremists. We all get faced with extremist candidates, and then try to justify our choices by repeating their rhetoric to ourselves and one another over and over.
The truth is that a huge cross-section of individuals in both parties with very similar moderate views exists, and that they are all pretty dissatisfied with the choices that keep being produced. It's just that one party is better at marketing its extremist candidates and pressing their success than the other is.
Some useful links on this topic (the revitalization of the Democratic Party):
http://www.newdem.org/
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20041213&s=beinart121304
Peter Beinert, Simon Rosenberg and Harold Ickes are some names to start watching for. If you guys are serious about this, start googling those names and let's talking strategies and candidates (including moderate Republican ones -- anyone say Colin Powell or John McCain???). We have to do this grass roots if it's ever going to happen.
One of the things he HAVE to avoid out of a matter of pure pragmatism is any candidate who will be perceived as a soft liberal (see Beinert article). If we want to take control of the country back, we CANNOT afford to front east-coast soft liberal candidates like Kerry, or any figurehead that is universally hated by the right. I hate to say it but I fear that H. Clinton might already be in that group. Much as some of us might want certain individuals, they may simply be another sure-fire formula for losing depending on where they stand in the eyes of the right at the time of the campaign.
We have to recapture the middle -- and we HAVE to do it before the extreme right wing figures out a way to do it first.
____________
I have menopause and a handgun. Any questions?
|
|
|