Heroes of Might and Magic Community
visiting hero! Register | Today's Posts | Games | Search! | FAQ/Rules | AvatarList | MemberList | Profile


Age of Heroes Headlines:  
5 Oct 2016: Heroes VII development comes to an end.. - read more
6 Aug 2016: Troubled Heroes VII Expansion Release - read more
26 Apr 2016: Heroes VII XPack - Trial by Fire - Coming out in June! - read more
17 Apr 2016: Global Alternative Creatures MOD for H7 after 1.8 Patch! - read more
7 Mar 2016: Romero launches a Piano Sonata Album Kickstarter! - read more
19 Feb 2016: Heroes 5.5 RC6, Heroes VII patch 1.7 are out! - read more
13 Jan 2016: Horn of the Abyss 1.4 Available for Download! - read more
17 Dec 2015: Heroes 5.5 update, 1.6 out for H7 - read more
23 Nov 2015: H7 1.4 & 1.5 patches Released - read more
31 Oct 2015: First H7 patches are out, End of DoC development - read more
5 Oct 2016: Heroes VII development comes to an end.. - read more
[X] Remove Ads
LOGIN:     Username:     Password:         [ Register ]
HOMM1: info forum | HOMM2: info forum | HOMM3: info mods forum | HOMM4: info CTG forum | HOMM5: info mods forum | MMH6: wiki forum | MMH7: wiki forum
Heroes Community > Other Side of the Monitor > Thread: Do you think the Stegasaurus knew?
Thread: Do you think the Stegasaurus knew?
bort
bort


Honorable
Supreme Hero
Discarded foreskin of morality
posted September 28, 2003 06:16 AM

Do you think the Stegasaurus knew?

Do you think he knew, as he grazed upon primeval plantlife that one day, his colon would be burned to propel a small ape to purchase warm brown water made from ground up and roasted seeds from a surly, pimply ape in an apron?  Did he know that one day, thousands of apes would fight for the right to extract his testicles from underneath the sand?  Did he know that a collosal metal pipe would be built on a continent that didn't even exist yet for the sole purpose of pumping his spleen across a frozen wasteland?  Of course not.  His brain was the size of a walnut (and was used to transport your pizza to you earlier this evening).  But had he known, would he have just let the T-rex eat him or would he have foraged for a high octane shrub so that his gall bladder would be a more efficient form of propulsion?
____________
Drive by posting.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Shepicker
Shepicker


Hired Hero
posted September 28, 2003 01:05 PM

Did dinos have testicles?

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Lord_Woock
Lord_Woock


Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
Daddy Cool with a $90 smile
posted September 28, 2003 01:26 PM

If they didn't have any, how would they reproduce?
____________
Yolk and God bless.
---
My buddy's doing a webcomic and would certainly appreciate it if you checked it out!

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Shepicker
Shepicker


Hired Hero
posted September 28, 2003 06:16 PM

they reproduced allright. but dont tesicles only describe the organ that produces sperm only if this organ is external ?

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Dingo
Dingo


Responsible
Legendary Hero
God of Dark SPAM
posted September 28, 2003 06:19 PM

LOL just LOL

Quote:
Did dinos have testicles?


LMAO!
____________
The Above Post/Thread/Idea Is CopyRighted by, The Dingo Corp.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Celfious
Celfious


Promising
Legendary Hero
From earth
posted September 28, 2003 10:52 PM
Edited By: Celfious on 28 Sep 2003

I know dinosoars had to reproduce some way, but dose this mean they had a wiener & or Vagina?

I know there were eggs, but did they ever get down and do the thing?
____________
What are you up to

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Dingo
Dingo


Responsible
Legendary Hero
God of Dark SPAM
posted September 29, 2003 05:40 AM

They had to, how would they reproduce?  
____________
The Above Post/Thread/Idea Is CopyRighted by, The Dingo Corp.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Celfious
Celfious


Promising
Legendary Hero
From earth
posted September 29, 2003 06:08 AM
Edited By: Celfious on 29 Sep 2003

They made eggs. And I guess the males came along and sprayed on them..

Or was it the other wy around??

My prime question which I will ask until I know, is did they have mucsles, and flesh with mr T, and Miss O? It's a true question. Mabey we found no dinosoar organs
____________
What are you up to

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Shepicker
Shepicker


Hired Hero
posted September 29, 2003 05:07 PM

silly

I never said that dinos did not have reproductive organs. My question is whether you call testicles only the "dangling bits" or you also call the reproductive male organs which are not dangling meaning inside the body testicles ? I am only curious because bort brought all them medical/ anatomical termini so I guess  he knows what he is talking about so I might aswell profit from the opportunity.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Lord_Woock
Lord_Woock


Honorable
Undefeatable Hero
Daddy Cool with a $90 smile
posted September 29, 2003 05:10 PM

The spray part is fish, Celf . Dino eggs are too hard on the outside for that way to actually work.
____________
Yolk and God bless.
---
My buddy's doing a webcomic and would certainly appreciate it if you checked it out!

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
bjorn190
bjorn190


Responsible
Supreme Hero
Jebus maker
posted September 29, 2003 05:45 PM

If u check the findings u will see that dinosaurs only had bones. Thats all they found.. no vaginas, no testicles, possibly some egg shells.  But the basic dino was just a pile of bones. And thats all they found

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
bort
bort


Honorable
Supreme Hero
Discarded foreskin of morality
posted November 30, 2004 11:48 PM

So typical that any mention of nutsacks, even if they are giant reptilian (or possibly giant pre-avian) ones distracts people so thoroughly from the actual question posed.  Was the Stegasarous aware of the long term effects of his consumption of massive quantities of plant material?
____________
Drive by posting.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Conan
Conan


Responsible
Supreme Hero
posted December 01, 2004 12:10 AM

maybe people don't answer your question because there's no point to it... Don't take this in a bad way, I just didn't know how else to write it. LOL
Why would you want to know such a thing?
____________
Your life as it has been is over. From this time forward, you will service.... us. - Star Trek TNG

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
Binabik
Binabik


Responsible
Legendary Hero
posted December 01, 2004 03:32 AM

Well, I'm not so sure brain size and intelligence are directly proportional. Look at birds for example. Many of them are pretty smart. Some can talk, and in some cases possibly even understand what the words mean. There have been experiments with talking birds where a person asks a question and the bird returns an intelligent answer either through speech or actions.

I used to have an African Grey. She loved the whistling on the Andy Griffith show. She knew the entire song. The show came on at 2:00pm. At about ten minutes before 2:00 she would start whistling the song. I used to always think she was as smart or smarter than the average dog, but a much smaller brain, smaller than a walnut.

Who knows what can happen with a small brain. Maybe the Stegosaurus not only knew what would happen, but maybe  intentionally created the ape. Maybe it knew if it farted just right, with a slight spiral twist, that the chromosomes would line up just right, resulting in an upright version of itself. Although I suspect it was really disappointed in the inefficiency of brain size.

BTW, my spell checker says "Stegosaurus" is spelled as here. And my spell checker has a brain approx 1cm x 1cm x 1mm and it's certainly not nearly as efficient as a biological analog brain.
____________

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Aculias
Aculias


Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
Pretty Boy Angel Sacraficer
posted December 01, 2004 04:09 AM

Well maybe the bigger they are the bigger the testies I mean I hear about Donkey balls & I am like dang.

I am sure they had it so big that they would def not make a prehistoric Dino with Crackers
____________
Dreaming of a Better World

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
terje_the_ma...
terje_the_mad_wizard


Responsible
Supreme Hero
Disciple of Herodotus
posted December 01, 2004 11:34 AM

Binabik: I belive they have now found a new species of human on the island of Flores in Indonesia. This human species, nicknamed the "Hobbit man" because of it's size, was a small creature. It lived isolated on an island, and most biologists agree that creatures living isolated on islands tend to shrink in size. So, this creature was smaller than us, and most of our ancestors, and it's brain was equally small.

Now, here's the interesting bit: These humans, from now on refered to as Hobbits, were able to make quite sophisticated tools out of stone; tools more advanced than those made by our ancestors with bigger brains.
What does this tell us?

It tells us that the size of a brain might not be as important to intelligence as was previously thought. It could be that the advancedness of the brain doesn't lay in its size, but in its, well, advancedness, kinda like a microchip is faster than one of those things they used in computers before the invention of microchips (I forgot the proper term for it).

So, it can probably be proved, once and for all, that size doesn't matter! (But it may help...)
____________
"Sometimes I think everyone's just pretending to be brave, and none of us really are. Maybe pretending to be brave is how you get brave, I don't know."
- Grenn, A Storm of Swords.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
ColdPhoenix
ColdPhoenix

Tavern Dweller
posted December 01, 2004 04:53 PM

Quote:
Well, I'm not so sure brain size and intelligence are directly proportional.


Intelligence is related both to brain size AND to the size of the brain compared to the body. These two factors taken together can give a pretty accurate estimate of intelligence.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Aculias
Aculias


Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
Pretty Boy Angel Sacraficer
posted December 02, 2004 04:22 AM

I wonder if Hobbits got hugh Knockers to then us regular size humans
____________
Dreaming of a Better World

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
darksparkle
darksparkle


Hired Hero
Quote the raven,
posted December 02, 2004 05:32 AM

why are you talking about dinos' reproductive organs? (thats the best way i can put it)
____________
Why does death have to be such a likely answer?

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
darksparkle
darksparkle


Hired Hero
Quote the raven,
posted December 02, 2004 05:46 AM

why isnt anyone adding to this?

____________
Why does death have to be such a likely answer?

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
Jump To: « Prev Thread . . . Next Thread »
Post New Poll    Post New Topic    Post New Reply

Page compiled in 0.0610 seconds