|
| Thread: Glorius Quests for Might and Magic - OOC | |
|
Drako_the_noob
Known Hero
Banned
|
posted August 25, 2008 09:37 AM |
|
|
Glorius Quests for Might and Magic - OOC
Glorius Quests for Might and Magic!
Well, our adventures are set in Terra.
To make a character, chose from a race and a class.
Races
Humans: I think we all know what Humans are. They can become anything, from Stupid Barbarian to Wise Mage, from Evil Death Knight to Heroic Paladin, etc. etc.
Elves: Elves are tall, slender people that are usually well adapted to using magic. All elf women are beautiful. And: ALL elves have Long Hair! If you cut it, it re-grows in 2 hours... Elves are only slightly resistant to some spells and make very good Robbers, Ninjas, Sorcerers and Archers.
Dwarves: Dwarves are short, but very tough. Dwarves are slightly resistant to most spells, but they are especially resistant to acid and poison. They make great Robbers and good Knights or Barbarians.
Gnomes: Gnomes are smaller than dwarves and not nearly as tough. Gnomes make good spell casters, but they tend to have less thoughness than all other races. They are agile and make extremly-good thieves and engineers. (Though engineer is not a playable class, and there's Robber instead of thief  )
Half-Orcs: Half-Orcs are a cross between a Human and an Orc. Half-Orcs are the toughest and strongest of the races players can choose, but they are also the stupidest and ugliest. Thus, Half-Orcs make excellent Knights and Barbarians, but they are the worst spell casters and Robbers.
Classes
Knight: The Knight is the best fighter in the game. Able to use any kind of weapon or armor, the Knight will dish out more damage than any other character. The Knight, being a pure fighter, obviously cannot cast any spells.
Paladin: The Paladin is a Cross/Mix beetwen Knight and Claric. The Paladin is a good fighter, though not as good as the Knight. Like the Knight, the Paladin can use any kind of weapon or armor, but he is tend to be weaker than the Knights. The Paladin starts with the ability to cast Cleric's spells.
Archer: Mix beetwen Knight and Sorcerrer. The Archer is about as good a fighter as the Paladin. The Archer starts with the ability to cast Sorcerrer's spells, but is unable to wear armor heavier than chain mail or use a shield. Just like his tilte says, he's the master of Bow (regandless of type, they are good at both long bow, short bow and crossbow)
Cleric: The Cleric is a fair fighter, but is not allowed to use edged weapons or missile weapons. On the bright side, the Cleric can use splint mail armor or lighter and has twice as many spell points available for casting Clerical spells as the Paladin.
Sorcerrer: The Sorcerer is an extremely poor fighter. Sorcerers are only able to wear padded armor and their weaponry is restricted to staves and daggers only. The Sorcerrer's spells of the Sorcerer are the most destructive in the game, however, plus they have twice as many spell points as the Archer to cast them with.
Robber: The Robber is an average fighter, but is unable to use any armor heavier than chain mail. Robbers can use almost any weapon and shields, but cannot cast spells. They have the ability to Steath, Unlock Doors, Pick-pockets and Backstab.
Ninja: Mic beetwen Robber and Knight. The Ninja is a good fighter, but is limited to ring mail or lighter armor and cannot use a shield. Ninjas can use most, though not all, weapons. Ninjas can also Steath, Unlock Doors, Pick-pockets and Backstab, just like Robbers do, but they are not so good it, instead ob thievery, they fucos on Fighting skills instead.
Barbarian: The Barbarian is almost as good a fighter as the Knight, but is unable to wear armor heavier than scale mail. To compensate for this, Barbarians are Stronger and Tougher. Barbarians can use most weapons and shields. The Barbarian cannot cast spells.
Druid: The Druid is a poor fighter. Druids are only able to use light armor and weapons, but they are able to cast both Sorcerrer's Spels and Cleric's Spells, and have twice as many spell points to cast them with as Rangers.
Ranger: he Ranger is the most versatile of all classes. Rangers are good fighters, are able to use most weapons and armor, and can cast Druid's spells, which is mostly a mixture of Cleric's and Sorcerrer's spells to a limited degree. I guess you could say they don't excel at anything in particular, but they can do a little bit of everything.
Game rules:
-Your character cannot be IMBA or Level 80, etc. Its a Forum RPG, not an MMORPG.
-No texts such as "n00b" "PWNd" "rulez" "cuz its ok" etc. Its an RPG, not Volcanic Wastelands.
-You cannot controll other characters! Maybe one or two NPC, but you can NOT controll a whole army.
-NO JOKE CHARACTERS!
So, what you need to chose to make your character:
Name:
Class:
Race:
Look: Character's hair, body, face, eyes, etc.
Story: Where did he born, how his childhood was, so, mainly the history of his life.
____________
rap=
R=retards
A=attempting
P=poetry
|
|
william
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
LummoxLewis
|
|
posted August 25, 2008 09:54 AM |
|
|
Okay, just some notes and/or some suggestions about this.
Quote:
Elves: Elves are tall, slender people that are usually well adapted to using magic. All elf women are beautiful. And: ALL elves have Long Hair! If you cut it, it re-grows in 2 hours... Elves are only slightly resistant to some spells and make very good Robbers, Ninjas, Sorcerers and Archers.
Alright. Does it really matter if the elven women are beautiful? And does it also matter if they have long hair or short hair? In fact, who cares about the hair and if it re-grows in 2 hours if it is cut. Is any of that relevant to this threads purpose?
I would also say that Elves are usually pretty resistant to spells. And if they are good at spells then wouldn't they make good robbers? You know, spells such as Invisibility or something?
Quote:
Dwarves: Dwarves are short, but very tough. Dwarves are slightly resistant to most spells, but they are especially resistant to acid and poison. They make great Robbers and good Knights or Barbarians.
How come they are resistant against acid and poison? Any particular reason for that? How would Dwarfs be good robbers? If they are Knights or Barbarians, then wouldn't they be having to wear armour and weapons? I couldn't see a robber wearing that. Elves would be better robbers if you ask me. 
Quote:
Half-Orcs: Half-Orcs are a cross between a Human and an Orc. Half-Orcs are the toughest and strongest of the races players can choose, but they are also the stupidest and ugliest. Thus, Half-Orcs make excellent Knights and Barbarians, but they are the worst spell casters and Robbers.
Again, does it really matter if they are stupid or ugly? If the person who is posting as a Half-Orc then I doubt that stupidity or looks would come into the picture. And I would have thought that Half-Orcs would have been good robbers. Seeing as though you think that they are ugly, then wouldn't the people turn to look away in disgust? All the time they need to steal whatever they wish.
Quote:
Knight: The Knight is the best fighter in the game. Able to use any kind of weapon or armor, the Knight will dish out more damage than any other character. The Knight, being a pure fighter, obviously cannot cast any spells.
If you were to make a thread like this, then I don't think that the Knight should be the best fighter in the game. In fact, I don't think that any should be a best fighter. Make it all even and there will be less dramas later on. That's been my experience in the past.
But if you want to keep him the best, then wouldn't not being able to use any spells be a bad thing? That would also mean that he wouldn't be able to block spells and I am pretty sure that something such as a Sorceress would not use a spell right in front of a Knight where they would be in target to get slashed to pieces with a sword or something. Sorceresses would usually stay away and cast their spells from a distance, and the Knight probably wouldn't be able to reach the sorceress and could die due to a spell or something.
You have to try and make everything balanced in some way or another. Not just labeling the Knight as the best fighter in the game due to just being able to use all weapons and armour in the game but not being able to cast spells (and I assume not being able to protect against them either).
Quote:
Paladin: The Paladin is a Cross/Mix beetwen Knight and Claric. The Paladin is a good fighter, though not as good as the Knight. Like the Knight, the Paladin can use any kind of weapon or armor, but he is tend to be weaker than the Knights. The Paladin starts with the ability to cast Cleric's spells.
If you still insist on having the Knight then wouldn't the Paladin be the best? I mean, they are able to use any kind of weapon or armour in the game PLUS they are able to start with agility and able to cast spells. That sounds stronger to me.
Quote:
Robber:... Unlock Doors...
Anything can unlock a door. Just use a sword and break it down or use strength and kick it down or use a spell.
Quote:
Barbarian: The Barbarian is almost as good a fighter as the Knight, but is unable to wear armor heavier than scale mail. To compensate for this, Barbarians are Stronger and Tougher. Barbarians can use most weapons and shields. The Barbarian cannot cast spells.
If the Barbarian is tougher and stronger than a Knight then wouldn't it be able to wear heavier things than the knight can? How can they be stronger and tougher but not able to wear scale mail or heavier? Doesn't make any sense to me.
It's a good start, but there are some obvious flaws that I see.
____________
~Ticking away the moments that
make up a dull day, Fritter and
waste the hours in an off-hand
way~
|
|
Drako_the_noob
Known Hero
Banned
|
|
posted August 25, 2008 10:02 AM |
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
Elves: Elves are tall, slender people that are usually well adapted to using magic. All elf women are beautiful. And: ALL elves have Long Hair! If you cut it, it re-grows in 2 hours... Elves are only slightly resistant to some spells and make very good Robbers, Ninjas, Sorcerers and Archers.
Alright. Does it really matter if the elven women are beautiful? And does it also matter if they have long hair or short hair? In fact, who cares about the hair and if it re-grows in 2 hours if it is cut. Is any of that relevant to this threads purpose?
I would also say that Elves are usually pretty resistant to spells. And if they are good at spells then wouldn't they make good robbers? You know, spells such as Invisibility or something?
Quote:
Quote:
Dwarves: Dwarves are short, but very tough. Dwarves are slightly resistant to most spells, but they are especially resistant to acid and poison. They make great Robbers and good Knights or Barbarians.
How come they are resistant against acid and poison? Any particular reason for that? How would Dwarfs be good robbers? If they are Knights or Barbarians, then wouldn't they be having to wear armour and weapons? I couldn't see a robber wearing that. Elves would be better robbers if you ask me.
In Might and Magic 3 Dwarwes are excelent Robbers
And its based on MM3 
Quote:
Quote:
Half-Orcs: Half-Orcs are a cross between a Human and an Orc. Half-Orcs are the toughest and strongest of the races players can choose, but they are also the stupidest and ugliest. Thus, Half-Orcs make excellent Knights and Barbarians, but they are the worst spell casters and Robbers.
Again, does it really matter if they are stupid or ugly? If the person who is posting as a Half-Orc then I doubt that stupidity or looks would come into the picture. And I would have thought that Half-Orcs would have been good robbers. Seeing as though you think that they are ugly, then wouldn't the people turn to look away in disgust? All the time they need to steal whatever they wish.
Not realy... They are bad thieves.
Quote:
Quote:
Knight: The Knight is the best fighter in the game. Able to use any kind of weapon or armor, the Knight will dish out more damage than any other character. The Knight, being a pure fighter, obviously cannot cast any spells.
If you were to make a thread like this, then I don't think that the Knight should be the best fighter in the game. In fact, I don't think that any should be a best fighter. Make it all even and there will be less dramas later on. That's been my experience in the past.
But if you want to keep him the best, then wouldn't not being able to use any spells be a bad thing? That would also mean that he wouldn't be able to block spells and I am pretty sure that something such as a Sorceress would not use a spell right in front of a Knight where they would be in target to get slashed to pieces with a sword or something. Sorceresses would usually stay away and cast their spells from a distance, and the Knight probably wouldn't be able to reach the sorceress and could die due to a spell or something.
You have to try and make everything balanced in some way or another. Not just labeling the Knight as the best fighter in the game due to just being able to use all weapons and armour in the game but not being able to cast spells (and I assume not being able to protect against them either).
In Might and Magic 3 Knights re the best fighters, and this game based on MM 3
And why they cannot be the best fighters? They are pure Fighters.
Well... Ability and Stat are other things.
Strenght and Toughness are STATS.
Being able to use any kind of weapon is ABILITY.
Quote:
Quote:
Paladin: The Paladin is a Cross/Mix beetwen Knight and Claric. The Paladin is a good fighter, though not as good as the Knight. Like the Knight, the Paladin can use any kind of weapon or armor, but he is tend to be weaker than the Knights. The Paladin starts with the ability to cast Cleric's spells.
If you still insist on having the Knight then wouldn't the Paladin be the best? I mean, they are able to use any kind of weapon or armour in the game PLUS they are able to start with agility and able to cast spells. That sounds stronger to me.
Well... if you can use all kinds of armour and weapon, and also cast spells, it doesen't make your stronger.
Phisicaly Knight is stronger than Paladin. I mean, Knight is better Fighter.
Quote:
Quote:
Robber:... Unlock Doors...
Anything can unlock a door. Just use a sword and break it down or use strength and kick it down or use a spell.
Thieves have Lock Picks
Quote:
Quote:
Barbarian: The Barbarian is almost as good a fighter as the Knight, but is unable to wear armor heavier than scale mail. To compensate for this, Barbarians are Stronger and Tougher. Barbarians can use most weapons and shields. The Barbarian cannot cast spells.
If the Barbarian is tougher and stronger than a Knight then wouldn't it be able to wear heavier things than the knight can? How can they be stronger and tougher but not able to wear scale mail or heavier? Doesn't make any sense to me.
Well... Ability and Stat are other things.
Strenght and Toughness are STATS.
Being able to wear Armour is ABILITY.
And in Might and Magic 3 Barbarians have More HPs than knights, but cannot wear heavy armour.
____________
rap=
R=retards
A=attempting
P=poetry
|
|
william
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
LummoxLewis
|
|
posted August 25, 2008 10:09 AM |
|
|
Quote:
And its based on MM3
Dwarves are resistant to poison and acid in MM3? 
Quote:
Not realy... They are bad thieves.
I was joking. Bad joke then, lol.
Quote:
In Might and Magic 3 Knights re the best fighters, and this game based on MM 3
And why they cannot be the best fighters? They are pure Fighters.
Seems you didn't get my point. My point was to try and keep everything balanced so that people who may choose to pick something else are not at a disadvantage in any way. Balanced = Better. In my opinion.
Quote:
Well... if you can use all kinds of armour and weapon, and also cast spells, it doesen't make your stronger.
But it would mean you are better than a Knight wouldn't it? 
Quote:
Thieves have Lock Picks
Seems you didn't get this joke either. *sigh*
Quote:
Well... Ability and Stat are other things.
Strenght and Toughness are STATS.
Being able to wear Armour is ABILITY.
And in Might and Magic 3 Barbarians have More HPs than knights, but cannot wear heavy armour.
In nearly all games that I have ever played, you are able to wear any piece of armour. Clothes can be classified as armour. So can chain mail. If the Barbarian is stronger and tougher than the Knight then it would mean that they would be able to wear heavier armour.
____________
~Ticking away the moments that
make up a dull day, Fritter and
waste the hours in an off-hand
way~
|
|
Drako_the_noob
Known Hero
Banned
|
|
posted August 25, 2008 10:18 AM |
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
And its based on MM3
Dwarves are resistant to poison and acid in MM3?
Yes they do.
Quote:
Quote:
Not realy... They are bad thieves.
I was joking. Bad joke then, lol.
Quote:
Quote:
In Might and Magic 3 Knights re the best fighters, and this game based on MM 3
And why they cannot be the best fighters? They are pure Fighters.
Seems you didn't get my point. My point was to try and keep everything balanced so that people who may choose to pick something else are not at a disadvantage in any way. Balanced = Better. In my opinion.
Well, they Cannot Cast spells.
Quote:
Quote:
Well... if you can use all kinds of armour and weapon, and also cast spells, it doesen't make your stronger.
But it would mean you are better than a Knight wouldn't it?
Nope.
Play some Might and Magic 1-9. The classes are fully from Might and Magic 3, and I won't change it only becuse you wish it, sorry.
Quote:
Quote:
Thieves have Lock Picks
Seems you didn't get this joke either. *sigh*
I have no sense of humor
Quote:
Quote:
Well... Ability and Stat are other things.
Strenght and Toughness are STATS.
Being able to wear Armour is ABILITY.
And in Might and Magic 3 Barbarians have More HPs than knights, but cannot wear heavy armour.
In nearly all games that I have ever played, you are able to wear any piece of armour. Clothes can be classified as armour. So can chain mail. If the Barbarian is stronger and tougher than the Knight then it would mean that they would be able to wear heavier armour.
Well, currently:
Quote:
"The Barbarian is almost as good a fighter as the Knight, but is unable to wear armor heavier than scale mail. To compensate for this, Barbarians have more Hit Points and gain extra attacks faster than any other class. Barbarians can use most weapons and shields. The Barbarian cannot cast spells and starts with no secondary skills."
Play some Might and Magic 1-9. The classes are fully from Might and Magic 3, and I won't change it only becuse you wish it, sorry.
____________
rap=
R=retards
A=attempting
P=poetry
|
|
King_Nikolai
Known Hero
with plans of Rebirth!
|
|
posted September 01, 2008 01:25 PM |
|
|
|
I have never played MM3. Will this RPG have some sort of combat system or what?
|
|
DagothGares
Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
No gods or kings
|
|
posted September 01, 2008 05:55 PM |
|
|
The member isn't able to answer the question (see his profile)
____________
If you have any more questions, go to Dagoth Cares.
|
|
B-E-T-A
Promising
Legendary Hero
Guess Who is Back?
|
|
posted September 01, 2008 11:08 PM |
|
|
|
Well sorry, but I won't come say that MM 3 sucked, just that the classes back there were inbalanced. Try to take classes from other games like MM6 or 7(or mabye even 8...)
|
|
lucky_dwarf
Promising
Supreme Hero
Visiting
|
|
posted March 29, 2009 08:27 PM |
|
|
banned... well that sucks
id have liked to play in another fantasy RP
____________
So much has changed in my absence.
|
| |
|
|
