Heroes of Might and Magic Community
visiting hero! Register | Today's Posts | Games | Search! | FAQ/Rules | AvatarList | MemberList | Profile


Age of Heroes Headlines:  
5 Oct 2016: Heroes VII development comes to an end.. - read more
6 Aug 2016: Troubled Heroes VII Expansion Release - read more
26 Apr 2016: Heroes VII XPack - Trial by Fire - Coming out in June! - read more
17 Apr 2016: Global Alternative Creatures MOD for H7 after 1.8 Patch! - read more
7 Mar 2016: Romero launches a Piano Sonata Album Kickstarter! - read more
19 Feb 2016: Heroes 5.5 RC6, Heroes VII patch 1.7 are out! - read more
13 Jan 2016: Horn of the Abyss 1.4 Available for Download! - read more
17 Dec 2015: Heroes 5.5 update, 1.6 out for H7 - read more
23 Nov 2015: H7 1.4 & 1.5 patches Released - read more
31 Oct 2015: First H7 patches are out, End of DoC development - read more
5 Oct 2016: Heroes VII development comes to an end.. - read more
[X] Remove Ads
LOGIN:     Username:     Password:         [ Register ]
HOMM1: info forum | HOMM2: info forum | HOMM3: info mods forum | HOMM4: info CTG forum | HOMM5: info mods forum | MMH6: wiki forum | MMH7: wiki forum
Heroes Community > Other Side of the Monitor > Thread: Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Bailout
Thread: Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Bailout This thread is 6 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 · «PREV / NEXT»
TitaniumAlloy
TitaniumAlloy


Honorable
Legendary Hero
Professional
posted October 07, 2008 06:54 AM

They should just send like, half a billion to me.
Not even half, like a quarter would be fine.
I mean they have seven hundred they're not going to notice but I will definitely notice
____________
John says to live above hell.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
OmegaDestroyer
OmegaDestroyer

Hero of Order
Fox or Chicken?
posted October 07, 2008 06:56 AM

You should see some of the pork they attached to it.  $6 million in tax cuts to wooden arrow makers was on the items.

Bravo Congress.  Bravo.
____________
The giant has awakened
You drink my blood and drown
Wrath and raving I will not stop
You'll never take me down

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Mytical
Mytical


Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
Chaos seeking Harmony
posted October 07, 2008 07:01 AM

Heck I would be happy with the money the 'pork' is talking about.  
____________
Message received.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
OmegaDestroyer
OmegaDestroyer

Hero of Order
Fox or Chicken?
posted October 07, 2008 07:28 AM

That's what happens when economists aren't in charge of the economy.
____________
The giant has awakened
You drink my blood and drown
Wrath and raving I will not stop
You'll never take me down

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
friendofgunnar
friendofgunnar


Honorable
Legendary Hero
able to speed up time
posted October 07, 2008 07:57 AM

Quote:
That's what happens when economists aren't in charge of the economy.


Very few economists saw this coming.  It's kind of a black art actually.  No matter how many calculations you put in a computer, you won't be able to predict the way people behave.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
OmegaDestroyer
OmegaDestroyer

Hero of Order
Fox or Chicken?
posted October 07, 2008 09:28 AM

Really starting to look bleak.
____________
The giant has awakened
You drink my blood and drown
Wrath and raving I will not stop
You'll never take me down

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
TitaniumAlloy
TitaniumAlloy


Honorable
Legendary Hero
Professional
posted October 07, 2008 11:01 AM

"Boys, when I was young chap there used to be this country called America."

"I thought America was the stuff of legends, papa! Like Atlantis."

"Well... it would be underwater now, but it was real let me tell ya "
____________
John says to live above hell.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
TitaniumAlloy
TitaniumAlloy


Honorable
Legendary Hero
Professional
posted October 07, 2008 12:13 PM

It can't be that bleak though.

I mean if you look at Japan who's stocks went down in 89 from like 38 thousand to seven... and Japan is doing just fine.

It's not the end of the world as we know it, as some would have you think.
____________
John says to live above hell.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
mvassilev
mvassilev


Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
posted October 07, 2008 02:34 PM

Quote:
Very few economists saw this coming.
Actually, nearly every economist saw this coming. But none of them knew exactly when the bubble would burst, and how bad it would be.

Quote:
I mean if you look at Japan who's stocks went down in 89 from like 38 thousand to seven... and Japan is doing just fine.
Except for their changing PMs every year.
____________
Eccentric Opinion

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
TitaniumAlloy
TitaniumAlloy


Honorable
Legendary Hero
Professional
posted October 08, 2008 06:34 AM

Yeah and they are in debt as well but if you actually go there and look around it's like, hey, they don't seem to care too much.

The infrastructure is good, civil services actually WORK, unemployment is low and your average person lives pretty well.


Changing PMs isn't really the end of the world like people are treating this financial crash, like it's going to sink the whole western world.
Did you hear about that guy who killed his family and turned the gun on himself over this whole thing
____________
John says to live above hell.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
killa_bee
killa_bee


Bad-mannered
Known Hero
posted October 23, 2008 06:53 PM

There's no way I'm going to read this whole thread, all I can say is... thank the ****in democrats for this situation... especially Bill Clinton... PERIOD.
____________

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
TitaniumAlloy
TitaniumAlloy


Honorable
Legendary Hero
Professional
posted October 26, 2008 11:27 AM

Thanks for your input Killa.
It is well thought and measured and as always of the highest quality and will be taken into consideration for the future direction of this discussion.
____________
John says to live above hell.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
Mytical
Mytical


Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
Chaos seeking Harmony
posted October 26, 2008 11:36 AM

I am wondering what ever happened.  Last I heard they had voted for the bailout..then nothing.  Heck I am not even sure who this bailout is going to help. Maybe a few Fannie Mae/Freddie Mack stockholders.  Deffinately not the people who owe them money, deffinately not the economy (they are going to buy 'bad debt' meaning things that probably wouldn't get paid).  Suposedly it will get these institutions to lend more money..but they will want to make their bottom line look as good as possible so they will be just as leery about lending.  Not the ones whos houses have been repossesed, too late for them.

Maybe the rich who will buy the houses for pennies on the dollar and rent them out?
____________
Message received.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
TitaniumAlloy
TitaniumAlloy


Honorable
Legendary Hero
Professional
posted October 26, 2008 11:43 AM

It's basically nationalized the banks, and now they're looking to nationalize the housing market as well
____________
John says to live above hell.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
Mytical
Mytical


Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
Chaos seeking Harmony
posted October 26, 2008 12:14 PM

A more sane approach (note : Maybe not the BEST approach, but much better then a bailout).

Government buys the houses in default for remaining balance minus any late fees.  Then using the FHA they offer the people who were defaulting a chance to get it back.  They lock in a rate of 5.5% interest (very generous, and the ammount I qualified for myself).  Regardless of credit history, etc.  Basically the former owners can have a 'blank slate' for the houses they already had paid on.  If the original owner does not want it, then a first time homeowner can get the 5.5% and the principle is only what the Government paid.

Takes time, but the government gets its money back plus a little interest.  The banks get their money, everybody is happy.  All that is lost is the 'late fees'.
____________
Message received.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
TitaniumAlloy
TitaniumAlloy


Honorable
Legendary Hero
Professional
posted October 26, 2008 12:51 PM

Who would have thought, in the United States of A, the world centre of Capitalism.
____________
John says to live above hell.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
doomnezeu
doomnezeu


Supreme Hero
Miaumiaumiau
posted October 26, 2008 01:04 PM

I do not know how the "nationalized houses" concept works in the USA, but we have this in Romania since... forever.

And it sucks. It sucks because, let's say you live in one. And then you buy it from the State. And then the original owner (or some relative of his) comes and claims it. And then the state gives it back to him, even if you bought it.

They are trying to fix this at the moment, but the President delays the law.

it sucks, mostly because I live in one of them houses, I bought it, and still live in fear that some dude will come claim it.
____________

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Mytical
Mytical


Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
Chaos seeking Harmony
posted March 18, 2009 10:20 AM

The latest in the 3 ring circus that is the bailout.  After recieving Billions (with a B) in bailout money AIG gave their executives 1.2 (or 3) Billion (with a B) in incentives.  Is that nuts or WHAT?!  So we give them this money just so they can make their uber wealthy excutives richer.  Man..people are right.  We Americans are CHUMPS.
____________
Message received.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
Moonlith
Moonlith


Bad-mannered
Supreme Hero
If all else fails, use Fiyah!
posted March 23, 2009 02:08 PM

Quote:
Quote:
Very few economists saw this coming.
Actually, nearly every economist saw this coming. But none of them knew exactly when the bubble would burst, and how bad it would be.


1. Alan Reynolds, Cato Institute:

   “No Housing Bubble Trouble,”Washington Times (January 8, 2005): “In short, we are asked to worry about something that has never happened for reasons still to be coherently explained. ‘Housing bubble’ worrywarts have long been hopelessly confused. It would have been financially foolhardy to listen to them in 2002. It still is.”

   “Recession Fairy Tales,” Townhall (October 5, 2006): “When it comes to homes . . . many people have spent the last four years fretting that the ‘housing bubble’ might end. That is, they worried that overpriced homes might become more affordable. This is not quite as nonsensical as worrying the price of oil might fall too much, but it’s close.”

2. Kevin Hassett, American Enterprise Institute:

   New York Times (July 25, 2004): “Another bubble-skeptic is Kevin Hassett, director of economic policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute and co-author of the fabled ‘Dow 36,000,’ which was published in 1999 when the Dow Jones index was around 11,000. Mr. Hassett says there is an ideological component to the belief in bubbles. Liberals, who tend to believe that government must step in to protect people from market imperfections, will likely see more of them. Conservatives, who like their markets unfettered, will see less.
   …
   “Mr. Hassett of the conservative American Enterprise Institute thinks housing prices will be pretty much O.K. He acknowledges there might be some bubble dynamics at play in some regions. But he argues that for the most part people are paying more for homes because their incomes are higher and interest rates are lower, reducing the cost to own a home.

   “Mr. Hassett expects that rising interest rates would raise this cost and home prices would then decline proportionately. But he sees no reason to expect a catastrophic decline. ‘I don’t think a catastrophe is very likely,’ he says.

3. James K. Glassman, American Enterprise Institute:

   “Housing Bubble?,” Capitalism Magazine (May 24, 2005): “[W]hile such signs of speculation are troubling, there is little solid evidence that a real estate bubble is puffing up.
   …
   “Even in places where prices are soaring, worries of a bubble could be overblown because higher prices appear grounded in good old fundamentals.”

4. Jude Wanniski, journalist/hack:

   “There is No Housing Bubble!!,” The Conservative Voice (August 13, 2005).

5. Jerry Bowyer, author of The Bush Boom:

   “Hate to Burst Your (Housing) Bubble: But there isn’t one,” National Review (July 5, 2006).

6. Nicolas P. Restinas, director, Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies:

   “More Than a Bubble Keeps Housing Prices Sky-High,” LA Times (May 20, 2004).

7. Jim Cramer, host of CNBC’s “Mad Money”:

   “House Beautiful,” New York Magazine (December 8, 2003): “Housing bubble? What housing bubble? The signs are in place for a further run-up in real estate. Breathe easy, mortgage holders. There’s still no place like home.”

8. Neil Barsky, Alson Capital Partners, LLC:

   “What Housing Bubble?,” Wall Street Journal (July 28, 2005): “There is no housing bubble in this country. Our strong housing market is a function of myriad factors with real economic underpinnings: low interest rates, local job growth, the emotional attachment one has for one’s home, one’s view of one’s future earning- power, and parental contributions, all have done their part to contribute to rising home prices.
   …
   “What we do have is a serious housing shortage and housing affordability crisis.”

9. Chris Mayer, professor of real estate, Columbia Business School, and Todd Sinai, professor of real estate, Wharton:

   “Bubble Trouble? Not Likely,” Wall Street Journal (September 19, 2005): “For the past several years, Chicken Littles have squawked that the sky — or the ceiling — is about to fall on the housing market. And it’s tempting to believe them.
   …
   “Yet basic economic logic suggests that this apparent evidence of a bubble is anything but. Even in the highest-price cities, housing is, at most, slightly more expensive than average.”

10. Jonathan McCarthy, senior economist, New York Fed, and Richard W. Peach, vice president, New York Fed:

   “Are Home Prices the Next Bubble?,” FRBNY Economic Policy Review (December 2004): “Home prices have been rising strongly since the mid-1990s, prompting concerns that a bubble exists in this asset class and that home prices are vulnerable to a collapse that could harm the U.S. economy.
   …
   “A close analysis of the U.S. housing market in recent years, however, finds little basis for such concerns. The marked upturn in home prices is largely attributable to strong market fundamentals: Home prices have essentially moved in line with increases in family income and declines in nominal mortgage interest rates.”

11. David Malpass, chief economist, Bear Stearns:

   “So This is a Weak Economy?,” Wall Street Journal (June 28, 2005): “[T]he litany against the U.S. economy is so ingrained and familiar that few disputed this spring’s ’slowdown.’ When strong data on income, employment, consumption and profits showed 3.5% first-quarter GDP growth and a continuation into the second quarter, the headlines shifted to other attacks — adjustable-rate mortgages, a housing ‘bubble,’ the distribution of income — rather than revising the slowdown story.”

12. Steve Forbes, CEO, Forbes, Inc.:

   Global Leaders Speakers Series (November 10, 2005):”[Forbes] maintained that there was no ‘housing bubble’ in the U.S. but there was an “oil bubble” driven by speculators.”

13. Brian S. Wesbury, chief investment strategist, Claymore Advisors:

   “Mr. Greenspan’s Cappuccino,” Wall Street Journal (May 31, 2005): “These nattering nabobs expect a housing collapse to take down the U.S. economy. But excessive pessimism is unwarranted: Fears of a housing bubble are overblown.”

14. Noel Sheppard, economist, Business & Media Institute:

   “Media Myths: The Housing Bubble is Bursting,”Business & Media Institute (Nov. 30, 2005): “The increase in real estate values the past five years has not resembled the rapid rise typically seen in a bubble.”

15. Carl Steidtmann, chief economist, Deloitte Research:

   “The Housing Bubble Myth,” Economist’s Corner (July 2005): “When you strip away all of the white noise around a housing bubble, what you find is a robust market for housing that is undergoing several profound changes all of which manifest themselves in higher home price indexes, none of which adds up to a housing price bubble.”

16. John K. McIlwain, senior resident fellow for housing, Urban Land Institute:

   “No Housing Bubble to Pop,” Washington Post (March 2, 2005): “[T]he housing markets will cool as interest rates rise and as affordability declines, but they won’t crash. Most markets will flatten for a while or increase at lower, more historical, rates. A few may decline for a year or two. But we won’t have a crash.”

17. Margaret Hwang Smith, professor of economics, Pomona College, and Gary Smith, professor of economics, Pomona College:

   “Bubble, Bubble, Where’s the Housing Bubble?,”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (2006): “Our evidence indicates that, even though prices have risen rapidly and some buyers have unrealistic expectations of continuing price increases, the bubble is not, in fact, a bubble in most of these areas in that, under a variety of plausible assumptions, buying a house at current market prices still appears to be an attractive long-term investment.”

18. Charles Himmelberg, economist, New York Fed:

   “Assessing High House Prices: Bubbles, Fundamentals, and Misperceptions,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports (September 2005): “As of the end of 2004, our analysis reveals little evidence of a housing bubble. In high appreciation markets like San Francisco, Boston, and New York, current housing prices are not cheap, but our calculations do not reveal large price increases in excess of fundamentals.”

19. Jim Jubak, investing columnist, MSN Money:

   “Why There is No Housing Bubble,” MSN Money (June 10, 2005): “Housing bubble? What housing bubble? With the 10-year U.S. Treasury bond yielding below 4% and 30-year mortgages available at 5.1%, there isnt a housing bubble.”

20. James F. Smith, director, Center for Business Forecasting:

   “There is No Housing Bubble in the USA: Housing Activity Will Remain At High Levels in 2005 and Beyond,” Business Economics (April 2005): “There is no evidence of a housing ‘bubble’ in the United States and housing demand should stay strong for years to come.”

21. Kathryn Jean Lopez, editor, National Review Online:

   “Don’t be Myth-Understood,” National Review (December 21, 2005): “[T]he so-called housing bubble has yet to pop, and likely won’t as long as home ownership remains a tax-advantaged event. Even the New York Times — no parrot of White House talking points — has had to admit that the economy is ‘booming.’”

22. Samuel Lieber, president, Alpine Woods Capital Investors:

   “Housing Bubble? The Market Won’t Pop, Experts Predict,” Wall Street Journal (April 12, 2006): “We don’t see a bubble. Historically, home prices just don’t go down nationwide unless we are in a significant recession. The last time home prices fell nationwide was in 1990. It’s employment that really counts. The underlying fundamentals of real estate are still very positive. Job creation and household formation drive housing.”

23. Mark Vitner, senior economist, Wachovia:

   “There is No Housing Bubble, Says Senior Economist,” The Virginia-Pilot (January 19, 2006): “‘Everybody is looking for evidence of a housing bubble,’ [Vitner] said. ‘There is not a housing bubble. The supply had not kept up with demand.’”

24. George Karvel, professor of real estate, St. Thomas University:

   “Housing bubble?,” Minneapolis Star Tribune, October 4, 2005 (via LEXIS): “‘There’s no housing bubble,’ said George Karvel, a professor of real estate at the University of St. Thomas. ‘This is a media-induced frenzy. If I wanted to say there is a housing bubble, I’d have Time and Money magazine camped on my door. They’ve called, and I’ve told them there’s no bubble. Panic sells.”
   …
   “There is absolutely nothing in any market in the country to indicate there’d be any kind of collapse in housing prices,’ he said.”



Are these the kinds of 'professional economists' you tend to base your opinion on about economic mechanisms? Since I can remember you bash me a lot about 'not knowing anything' about economics.
____________

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
mvassilev
mvassilev


Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
posted March 23, 2009 02:26 PM

I like how you're backing those statements up with the source where you got them... o wait. And if you look at these statements, you will realize that some of them aren't too outrageous.

Plus I distinctly remember reading about the housing bubble in several places - years before it burst.
____________
Eccentric Opinion

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Jump To: « Prev Thread . . . Next Thread » This thread is 6 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 · «PREV / NEXT»
Post New Poll    Post New Topic    Post New Reply

Page compiled in 0.0836 seconds