Heroes of Might and Magic Community
visiting hero! Register | Today's Posts | Games | Search! | FAQ/Rules | AvatarList | MemberList | Profile


Age of Heroes Headlines:  
20 Dec 2014: A Christmas Gift: Random Skills in Heroes VII! - read more
16 Dec 2014: Introducing Shapers of Lore, Academy Line-Up Detailed - read more
10 Dec 2014: Heroes III HD Remake Announced for January 29th! - read more
5 Dec 2014: Website Update delayed, Community Q&A, new Vote on the way! - read more
24 Nov 2014: The Wizards’ Armies Have Arrived! - read more
14 Nov 2014: Dungeon Line-up Vote #2 Results! - read more
11 Nov 2014: HC Icon Contest, Sylvan Townscreen Vote #2 - read more
7 Nov 2014: Dungeon Line-up Vote Round 2, Sylvan Townscreen Part 1! - read more
2 Nov 2014: Dungeon wins, line-up vote starts! - read more
18 Oct 2014: Tidbits of Information from Twitch.tv Stream! - read more
20 Dec 2014: A Christmas Gift: Random Skills in Heroes VII! - read more
[X] Remove Ads
LOGIN:     Username:     Password:         [ Register ]
HOMM1: info forum | HOMM2: info forum | HOMM3: info forum | HOMM4: info forum | HOMM5: info forum | MMH6: wiki forum | MMH7: wiki forum
Heroes Community > Age of Heroes Coliseum > Thread: Pre ICTC 2010- Judges Search
Thread: Pre ICTC 2010- Judges Search [ This thread is 4 pages long: 1 (2) 3 4 ]
DarkShadow
DarkShadow


Legendary Hero
Cerise Princess
posted December 05, 2009 12:52 PM

It's ICTC time again?

Maybe ill finish my monkey faction this year

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
DagothGares Online
DagothGares


Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
No gods or kings
posted December 05, 2009 01:28 PM

Quote:
Think it was out of 50, by any criteria the judges wanted????
thanks, mytical, I was just curious. I usually am not a fan of having originality as this major factor, but if no one else sees fault in this, then sure I'll judge it by the given criteria.
____________
Cursed one, do you really think you can manage the glories which are my spells?

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Mytical
Mytical

Hero of Order
Chaos seeking Harmony
posted December 06, 2009 04:59 AM

Just remember, that you decide what originality IS. You can also give everybody a score of 0 (or insert same score for everybody) making it not a factor at all for you.
____________
Message received.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
Tobius
Tobius


Adventuring Hero
posted December 06, 2009 04:19 PM
Edited by Tobius at 16:23, 06 Dec 2009.

Criterions

Well, I must agree with Dagoth. Your listed criterions, Mytical, are a good starting point but when faced with actual judging I think they are inferior to the grading systems of ICTC 1-3 because in my eyes they don't really convey what qalifies a good contest entry by any means.

Apart from that your list lacks the details needed for congruent judging!

However, in view of the fact that there's still one month to go before you officially(?) launch the contest, I think we should rethink the criterions because without a detailed grading standard we'd let wander the contestants into to a free space that isn't beneficial for any elaborated out-comings.

Hence my approach would be to take the best of the first three systems and merge it into the final and binding(!) form since, from my point of view, especially the last two contests have been characterized by rather incomparable ratings as each jugde did the grading as he liked.

Indeed, I think, only one grading standard for all judges can ensure that really the best entry emerges finally. Otherwise we're just comparing apples and oranges again.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
sith_of_ziost
sith_of_ziost


Promising
Supreme Hero
Scouting the Multiverse
posted December 06, 2009 05:19 PM

Well, the criteria I always uses is Creativity, Detail, Balance, Playability (which can combine with Balance to give more points to Detail & Creativity) then the all powerful Discretionary points that are given as per the judges taste.

As I see it, there are two forgone conclusions: that the judges need a set system, not a personal scoring power, and that either competition requires two different systems.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
Mytical
Mytical

Hero of Order
Chaos seeking Harmony
posted December 06, 2009 05:23 PM

Well, since I am the Host..and not a Judge, my criteria was just a suggestion.  The judges can feel free to agree on a criteria, and use it instead.
____________
Message received.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
Tobius
Tobius


Adventuring Hero
posted December 06, 2009 06:00 PM
Edited by Tobius at 18:04, 06 Dec 2009.

I'll try to make myself better understood.

What I think of being useful for the judges and the contestants is a distinct, logically consistant set of grading/marking/scoring (name it whatever you like best) rules. Something alike the marking sheet of the 2nd ICTC. Hence all the judges and contestants would again 'work' on the same basic criterion and thus more target-oriented.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Mytical
Mytical

Hero of Order
Chaos seeking Harmony
posted December 06, 2009 06:10 PM

Which is fine.  I am just the MC and Host (and granter of the qp that come to the winners), somebody asked for criteria, I put out a suggestion.  Its all good.
____________
Message received.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
Tobius
Tobius


Adventuring Hero
posted December 06, 2009 06:47 PM

OK, Mytical. But then I'd like to get to know more about your intended 'REdesign contest' because the way I understood your proposal I don't think it necessarily is different from the original ICTC as you could make up a 'new', for example, Haven there if you only wanted to.

Rather I think it'd even torpedo the original idea behind contest as on the one side then there would be the 'original' towns and on the other side there would be the 'recapped' one's thus reducing originality in itself to absurdity.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Mytical
Mytical

Hero of Order
Chaos seeking Harmony
posted December 06, 2009 06:57 PM

Well the redesigned town is a bit simpler, and has to make sense.  Like for instance, throwing in all mechanical creatures for 'Haven' would not make sense.  The all mechanical Haven would be ok for the original contest, but not the remaking one.  It has to fit the H5 theme as it is currently.  Also, you don't have to recreate skills, etc unless you want.
____________
Message received.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
blizzardboy
blizzardboy


Honorable
Legendary Hero
Mr. Sandman
posted December 06, 2009 07:00 PM
Edited by blizzardboy at 19:01, 06 Dec 2009.

I really hope people ignore the 2nd contest, because we're going on our 5th year of Heroes 5 and this place has a depleted amount of members as it is. You can participate in both, but don't count on hardly anybody doing that. I'm going to be obnoxiously holding up a "I told you so" sign if we get 10 participants and they're split between 2 contests.
____________
Want to show off your very own Heroes town? Enter the ICTC, for a free metaphorical cruise for a family of 4 to the Bahamas

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Fauch
Fauch


Responsible
Undefeatable Hero
posted December 06, 2009 07:01 PM

100 pts for the story? who cares about the story? the gameplay is more important.

makes me think of mapmaking for FPS. some people build maps which look stunning, but are very uninteresting to play

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Tobius
Tobius


Adventuring Hero
posted December 06, 2009 07:02 PM
Edited by Tobius at 19:03, 06 Dec 2009.

Well, I'm still not convinced that it's true to the today's idea of an ICTC (evolving the game) but I'd like to hear some other opinions.

(In my eyes it's like repeating the HoMM5 town contest and selling it as ICTC.)

EDIT: Dito, blizzard.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Cepheus
Cepheus


Honorable
Legendary Hero
Far-flung Keeper
posted December 06, 2009 07:13 PM

As I said however long ago, this really hasn't a snowball's chance in hell of becoming bigger and better than ever until Heroes VI gets announced. Pass the "I told you so" sign when you're done.
____________
"Those who forget their history are inevitably doomed to repeat it." —Proverb, Might and Magic VIII

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Mytical
Mytical

Hero of Order
Chaos seeking Harmony
posted December 06, 2009 07:29 PM

Blizzard, so what if that is the case?  First, the two have absolutely nothing to do with each other.  People can choose to do one, the other, or both.  If they were not going to participate in one, that would not change.  However, this is a contest for others, not me.  Make a poll, whatever people decide I will be happy with.

Cepheus.  The point of that would be...??
____________
Message received.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
Vlaad
Vlaad


Admirable
Legendary Hero
ghost of the past
posted December 06, 2009 07:32 PM
Edited by Vlaad at 19:36, 06 Dec 2009.

H6 is going to be announced sometime next year, so there's no reason to start before that. The next ICTC has a chance to be as successful as the first one, why rush it?

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
blizzardboy
blizzardboy


Honorable
Legendary Hero
Mr. Sandman
posted December 06, 2009 07:36 PM

For me, the contest loses a lot of its spark if you have a really low number of participants. The size of it makes it exciting, therefore splitting into two contests on the 5th year is a big thumbs down for me. Maybe not everybody feels that way though.
____________
Want to show off your very own Heroes town? Enter the ICTC, for a free metaphorical cruise for a family of 4 to the Bahamas

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Vlaad
Vlaad


Admirable
Legendary Hero
ghost of the past
posted December 06, 2009 07:38 PM
Edited by Vlaad at 19:38, 06 Dec 2009.

Quote:
For me, the contest loses a lot of its spark if you have a really low number of participants. The size of it makes it exciting, therefore splitting into two contests on the 5th year is a big thumbs down for me. Maybe not everybody feels that way though.
Agreed.

In addition, half of the entries usually fit into the Factions Remade category anyway.
____________

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Tobius
Tobius


Adventuring Hero
posted December 06, 2009 07:57 PM
Edited by Tobius at 20:05, 06 Dec 2009.

Now or never?

Quote:
H6 is going to be announced sometime next year, so there's no reason to start before that. The next ICTC has a chance to be as successful as the first one, why rush it?

Another statement may not to be neglected.

Just look at the last contest's reception as the enthusiasm around Heroes had noticeably decreased ... and I don't presume it's increased in the last year without any substantial news!

Besides I again share blizzard's apprehension and Vlaad reassures my opinion that redesigning factions has been part of ICTC's from the start...

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
pei
pei


Famous Hero
Fresh Air.
posted December 06, 2009 08:08 PM
Edited by pei at 03:11, 07 Dec 2009.

Ill judge if its ok to some people as im a noob PLUS sometimes make no sense at all in my posts. If not then i guess ill have to participate.

EDIT:
Observing that Mytical was indeed online and took his/her (who cares) time to post perks but not reply or type any kind of text that could be interpreted as a reply to my humble offering i will rephrase my previous statement.

im a noob PLUS sometimes make no sense at all in my posts.

Please note that there is no smiley now.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
[ This thread is 4 pages long: 1 (2) 3 4 ] < Prev Thread . . . Next Thread >
Post New Poll    Post New Topic    Post New Reply

Page compiled in 0.0534 seconds