|
| Thread: Resistance VS Interference |  This thread is pages long: 1 2 · «PREV |
|
Phoenix4ever
Legendary Hero
Heroes is love, Heroes is life
|
posted March 23, 2025 11:25 AM |
|
|
@FfuzzyLogik
I think you are on to something with this. 
Let's say you combine Resistance and Interference and let it be 20% at Expert, even if you or someone else uses Orb of Vulnerability, only the Resistance part would be removed, allowing you to resurrect dragons, the Interference would still take effekt.
And yeah I don't think 100% Interference is a good idea. (Giselle)
|
|
LordCameron
Known Hero
Veteran of the Succession Wars
|
|
posted March 23, 2025 03:44 PM |
|
|
FfuzzyLogik said:
- You'll have a 30% golem type protection from damaging spells (so no total miss for a "fail chain lightning" for example).
I suggest then for the actual golems it cummulates (you'll have -50% for your golems and -30% on the reduced damage to them, no add [50%+30%] to get the bonus or golems will be soon immune to magic)
This just made realize that spells with very high base damage and no scaling (like Inferno) are less effected by Interference. That could be for or against in its favour. It also makes me see how elegant a solution it was, but something feels wrong about wrecking one primary skill with a secondary one. Like armourer doesn't decrease attack, it decreases damage.
Maybe golem-like resistance is the way to go. And while at it, maybe golems should also decrease the length of spells cast on them. Like you need 40 power to keep slow on diamond golems for more than 1 turn.
____________
What are Homm Songs based on?
|
|
baronus
Legendary Hero
|
|
posted March 25, 2025 09:03 AM |
|
|
|
More skills always ie better. Rest is correctly skill ballance.
|
|
FfuzzyLogik
Known Hero
|
|
posted March 25, 2025 09:44 AM |
|
|
I don't agree here Baronus.
Interference and resistance do quite the same thing. Increasing the number of skill are "redundant" does not improve the game quality imo.
Imagine an other skill to improve combat damage with a different effect (like lets say add attack skill to creatures, a bit more to lower level creature let's say) it will do like offense or like primary skills to non ranged attackers...
Would it make the game better ? I don't think so. Even if you make it nor better nor stronger than offense or archery...
Most important is to let "choices" (so a good amount of skills is, and here you're right, necessary)... But to equlibrate better the skills for they have "all" a place to be used (not really "niche" one).
The other point to "not add" too many skills is the "random issue". If you have maaaaany skills, its harder to equilibrate them and you'll have difficulties to get "the needed ones" when you level up.
So a huge random unbalance may be made...
____________
FfuzzyLogik.
If I'm crazy ? Sure, because its madness to be normal...
|
|
|
|
