Heroes of Might and Magic Community
visiting hero! Register | Today's Posts | Games | Search! | FAQ/Rules | AvatarList | MemberList | Profile


Age of Heroes Headlines:  
5 Oct 2016: Heroes VII development comes to an end.. - read more
6 Aug 2016: Troubled Heroes VII Expansion Release - read more
26 Apr 2016: Heroes VII XPack - Trial by Fire - Coming out in June! - read more
17 Apr 2016: Global Alternative Creatures MOD for H7 after 1.8 Patch! - read more
7 Mar 2016: Romero launches a Piano Sonata Album Kickstarter! - read more
19 Feb 2016: Heroes 5.5 RC6, Heroes VII patch 1.7 are out! - read more
13 Jan 2016: Horn of the Abyss 1.4 Available for Download! - read more
17 Dec 2015: Heroes 5.5 update, 1.6 out for H7 - read more
23 Nov 2015: H7 1.4 & 1.5 patches Released - read more
31 Oct 2015: First H7 patches are out, End of DoC development - read more
5 Oct 2016: Heroes VII development comes to an end.. - read more
[X] Remove Ads
LOGIN:     Username:     Password:         [ Register ]
HOMM1: info forum | HOMM2: info forum | HOMM3: info mods forum | HOMM4: info CTG forum | HOMM5: info mods forum | MMH6: wiki forum | MMH7: wiki forum
Heroes Community > Tavern of the Rising Sun > Thread: 50 reasons why Lord of the Rings sucks
Thread: 50 reasons why Lord of the Rings sucks This thread is 5 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 · «PREV / NEXT»
Nebuka
Nebuka


Promising
Supreme Hero
Save me Jebus!
posted March 31, 2003 09:51 PM

Quote:
P.S.: If you think that person was funny then you must have a extremly bad sence of humor...


Ugh! Well, you're right...I'll get right on Wayans brothers.
____________

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
DonGio
DonGio


Promising
Famous Hero
of Clear Water Mountain Clan
posted April 01, 2003 04:16 PM

Quote:


And if stupidity hurt wouldn't you be in a
hospital by now?




Thanks for emphasizing my point... stupidity doesn't hurt the stupid ones, it hurts the well versed!

And pardon me... but do you actually think it a clever critique of his critique to just say "he's got no idea what he's talking about"?!?! You sure showed us!

Dixi
DonGio
____________
There are 10 types of people: Those who read binary, and those who don't.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
I
I


Famous Hero
posted April 04, 2003 04:30 PM

Checked a page of youor discussion and I'm loling on the floor. The one that told that the book is horrible & sucks etc. Probably didn't read it (probably to small number of images for him). I think the best thing we do is to make thread: "Why LotR is better than all others? "

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
ToxicSheep
ToxicSheep


Hired Hero
keepin it gangsta
posted April 05, 2003 03:18 AM

dude LOTR is the best movie.  who cares if smoke can't travel horizontally?  and what's up with the anti-violence reason?  that was the coolest part of the movie.  all of the fighting.
____________

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
ToxicSheep
ToxicSheep


Hired Hero
keepin it gangsta
posted April 05, 2003 03:24 AM

hey, did you guys read any of the other articles on that site?  i read the one bout eminem.  they thought he had a penis named haley.  it's his frickin daughter.  i don't care if people make fun of eminem but they should at least get the facts straight.
____________

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
DarkPrime
DarkPrime

Tavern Dweller
posted April 27, 2003 05:52 PM

Morons. LoTR does not suck. These reasons are all bullsh*t.

My reasons now! There's a punch for every piece of bullcrap.

Quote:
I've heard some students are even forced to read some novelization of the movie in their literature classes. Ridiculous. Does Hollywood run our classrooms now?


It was a book that was written by JRR Tolkien more than 50 years ago dumbass. Peter Jackson made it into a movie. PUNCH!

Quote:
Hollywood can't make a movie these days without crapping out a sequel the next year to squeeze more money out of the sheep. Guess what; there's ANOTHER LOTR movie coming this Christmas. Gee, I wonder what will bring Rocky out of retirement this time?


And there'll be anothe one this year. It is a trilogy thickhead. Three books - Three movies. Oh yeah, the movie wasn't made in Hollywood. It was New Zealand. Idiot. PUNCH!

Quote:
Millions of copies of the LOTR DVD have thick black bars at the bottom and top of the screen throughout the film. Didn't anyone catch this? You know what happens at the end, in the extreme foreground and extreme upper sky? Neither do I. Bush league, guys.


LOL. It's widescreen you imbecile! PUNCH!

Quote:
Look closely and you'll notice the human member of their party is played by two different actors at different points of the movie (it takes a sharp eye to notice, but one of them has red hair, one black).


They're both different characters you asshead! One is Aragorn who is played by Viggo Mortensen, the other is Boromir played by Sean Bean (he was Alec Trevelyan in James Bond Goldeneye). PUNCH!

Quote:
In the massive Mt. Doom battle scene at the beginning of Fellowship of the Ring, a DVD pause reveals at least half a dozen of the 50,000 Orc Warrior extras are wearing modern tennis shoes.


I'll leave you on this one Sonny Jim. Whatever. PUNCH! That's for stupidity!

Quote:
The Orcs were obviously stolen from PC game maker Blizzard and its Warcraft series. Too bad Blizzard is apparently too scared to sue New Line over it.


LoTR was made 50 years before Warcraft. And that'll be a double punch! PUNCH! PUNCH!

Quote:
Percentage of protagonists in Fellowship who are white: 100. Meanwhile the black antagonists and their black crow spies and their black glass seeing ball inhabit their black towers and perform black magic. Gosh, I wonder if there's some symbolism there?


Where does racism come in! You're talking horsesh*t. PUNCH!

Quote:
The ring, which is seen to be at least two inches in diameter at the beginning to fit the polish sausage-sized finger of Sauron, suddenly fits Frodo's child-sized finger later. I guess this movie takes place in a world where rings magically change sizes on their own.


It is magic you buffoon! PUNCH!

Quote:
Give me one reason that story couldn't have been told without all the fighting.


It isn't all fighting. It turns out not only you're stupid, but you're pratically blind. PUNCH!

Quote:
If you watch closely during the Inn scene, Frodo and his crew are shown getting stabbed by the Ring Wraiths. Then, five seconds later, they are fine again. Note to the director: try proofreading your movie before you release it to the public.


They were fake decoys. PUNCH!

Quote:
Liv Tyler's character is seen easily defeating nine strong supernatural beings, even though she is clearly a woman.


She's part maia. And you are also being sexist. And that was only in the film. It was a male elf who escorted Frodo in the book. TRIPLE PUNCH!

Ok, enough for now, but I'll be back to punch you more!



____________

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
DonGio
DonGio


Promising
Famous Hero
of Clear Water Mountain Clan
posted April 28, 2003 11:32 AM
Edited By: DonGio on 28 Apr 2003

Oh, Lord, the stupidity.

OK, DarkPrime, since you OBVIOUSLY haven't bothered to read the whole thread, I'll bring you up to speed.

You, and a bunch of your simpelton soulmates, don't GET IT.


THE WHOLE ARTICLE IS IRONY!!! SARCASM!!! IT'S A PARODY OF PEOPLE CRITIQUING LOTR!!! YOU PEOPLE ARE SO IMMENSELY DENSE!!!

Quadrouple PUNCH!!! YEAH!!! COOL!!!
____________
There are 10 types of people: Those who read binary, and those who don't.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
terje_the_ma...
terje_the_mad_wizard


Responsible
Supreme Hero
Disciple of Herodotus
posted April 28, 2003 11:46 AM

Quote:
dude LOTR is the best movie.  who cares if smoke can't travel horizontally?  and what's up with the anti-violence reason?  that was the coolest part of the movie.  all of the fighting.


To correct you: LotR: The Two Towers wasn't a good movie. The Fellowship of the Ring was better, and I fear that Return of the King will be even worse (still hoping for the oposite, though..).

And the violence fun? No.

P.S. Why does this thread still live? Are there still people stupid enough not to see the obvious irony/sarcasms? After all the explaination attemts by Nebuka and DonGio, amongst others?

(Please do not care about my opinions. I'm a snobb, you see...)
____________
"Sometimes I think everyone's just pretending to be brave, and none of us really are. Maybe pretending to be brave is how you get brave, I don't know."
- Grenn, A Storm of Swords.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
DarkPrime
DarkPrime

Tavern Dweller
posted April 28, 2003 08:03 PM

TTT was better than FoTR.

Return of the King might just blow it. They've left out the scouring of the shire and they're gonna put in too much Aragorn/Arwen snow.
____________

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Nebuka
Nebuka


Promising
Supreme Hero
Save me Jebus!
posted April 28, 2003 09:56 PM

dOOd, lotr rules!

It has Vulcans in it!!



And check spoilers for ROTK!!

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

Gollum goes Hollywood!!




____________

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Gothmog
Gothmog


Adventuring Hero
Honorable
posted April 28, 2003 10:59 PM

DarkPrime:

You stole words out of my mouth!

Shakes hands.

   

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
The_Gootch
The_Gootch


Honorable
Supreme Hero
Kneel Before Me Sons of HC!!
posted May 13, 2003 02:54 PM

DarkPrime... I found your reaction to the link to be funnier than the link itself.  Oh...someone give me a hankie.  I'm crying over here, lol
____________

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
GrunanCross
GrunanCross


Famous Hero
King of the Underdark
posted May 14, 2003 08:35 AM

   The wholeness of the fact is that LOTR the movie really does sux, bad! I'm sorry to say this but it is true. All the books just taking a single page is better than both of the movies out now, the tird is going to be a lovie-dovie-get every female to see me load of Mighty G crap...

____________

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Frick
Frick


Known Hero
and eternal n00b.
posted May 14, 2003 12:32 PM

Hehe. Funny, even if most of the parts were totally WRONG!
And all the bad stuff in the film is based upon the book. And therefore it is Tolkien himself that should be blamed instead of Peter Jacksson...
____________
Hey you, see me, pictures crazy, all the world I've seen before me passing by

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
GrunanCross
GrunanCross


Famous Hero
King of the Underdark
posted May 14, 2003 12:39 PM

Quote:
Hehe. Funny, even if most of the parts were totally WRONG!
And all the bad stuff in the film is based upon the book. And therefore it is Tolkien himself that should be blamed instead of Peter Jacksson...




 Ok side the fack that you don't know jack about the movie, Peter really messed this book to hell
____________

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
terje_the_ma...
terje_the_mad_wizard


Responsible
Supreme Hero
Disciple of Herodotus
posted May 14, 2003 12:42 PM

Quote:
And there'll be anothe one this year. It is a trilogy thickhead. Three books - Three movies. Oh yeah, the movie wasn't made in Hollywood. It was New Zealand. Idiot. PUNCH!


For being one who claims to know much about Tolkien, you seem quite ignorant to the fact that it's not a triology, even if it is divided into three parts.

BTW, this thread is still one of the most fun ones in the Tavern. Always nice seeing people who don't understand sarcasm...

Agree, Grunan. the films weren't any good. the books are WAY better.
____________
"Sometimes I think everyone's just pretending to be brave, and none of us really are. Maybe pretending to be brave is how you get brave, I don't know."
- Grenn, A Storm of Swords.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
GrunanCross
GrunanCross


Famous Hero
King of the Underdark
posted May 14, 2003 12:46 PM
Edited By: GrunanCross on 14 May 2003




Of course the book are better. that way the chars are how u want them to be right?
____________

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
GrunanCross
GrunanCross


Famous Hero
King of the Underdark
posted May 14, 2003 12:54 PM

.........Sorry that was my friend............he is a bit of a snow!
____________

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
Planeswalker
Planeswalker


Famous Hero
Chaotic Good
posted May 14, 2003 12:55 PM

Quote:
Hehe. Funny, even if most of the parts were totally WRONG!
And all the bad stuff in the film is based upon the book. And therefore it is Tolkien himself that should be blamed instead of Peter Jacksson...


Blame Tolkien? What BS. If Petey should follow every word in Tolkien's books, however, one movie would have lasted 6 hours. And I don't think anyone would base a film on "bad stuff," but maybe Petey just removed too many vitalities to make the movie work.(?)
____________
Like 2D RPGs? Download Everestia! everestiagame.com

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link
terje_the_ma...
terje_the_mad_wizard


Responsible
Supreme Hero
Disciple of Herodotus
posted May 14, 2003 12:58 PM

Quote:
TTT was better than FoTR.

Return of the King might just blow it. They've left out the scouring of the shire and they're gonna put in too much Aragorn/Arwen snow.


Nooooooo! The scouring must be in it, or won't see it! The scouring is one of the best parts of the books, with the little men rising up against and crushing the 'big man'... though i doubt John Ronald meant it to be interpreted that way...
____________
"Sometimes I think everyone's just pretending to be brave, and none of us really are. Maybe pretending to be brave is how you get brave, I don't know."
- Grenn, A Storm of Swords.

 Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | PP | Quote Reply | Link
Jump To: « Prev Thread . . . Next Thread » This thread is 5 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 · «PREV / NEXT»
Post New Poll    Post New Topic    Post New Reply

Page compiled in 0.0804 seconds